<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal Online First</title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
<description>Emergency Medicine Journa RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:eIssn>1472-0213</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Emergency Medicine Journal</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1472-0205</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215891v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215837v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215861v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215652v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215749v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216135v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215623v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215411v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215483v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215836v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214235v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215916v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214159v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216076v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216031v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215770v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215778v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214819v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215217v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215194v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215189v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215154v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215135v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215673v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215617v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215376v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215822v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215904v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216019v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215905v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215840v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215110v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215099v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215220v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216075v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216070v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215369v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214835v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215114v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215492v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215449v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215940v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215074v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215530v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215574v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215982v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215272v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215602v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215283v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215388v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215655v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215690v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215651v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215510v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215894v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215613v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215703v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215888v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215527v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215682v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215688v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215660v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215373v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214983v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215436v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215578v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214271v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215470v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215433v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215118v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215389v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215742v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214733v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215575v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215335v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215806v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214901v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215647v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214837v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215355v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214861v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215309v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215303v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214621v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215295v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214536v1?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215891v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[National surveys on the use of local anaesthetic with adrenaline (LANTERN study) in the emergency setting]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215891v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Local anaesthetic with adrenaline (LAWA) provides effective anaesthesia with haemostasis and prolonged action. Despite concerns that adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction may cause ischaemic necrosis in areas supplied by end arteries, hand surgeons routinely use LAWA safely.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> These concerns are reflected in manufacturer guidance, which is based on a small number of historic case reports using non-commercial preparations. Informal interactions with clinicians suggested that dogma regarding LAWA safety may persist from undergraduate training into emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to assess current knowledge, attitudes and practice relating to LAWA among students and ED staff across the British Isles.</p><p>Three surveys were conducted between 6 April and 6 November 2024: a knowledge survey, a clinical practice survey and a medical school curriculum survey (). Surveys were distributed through collaborative research networks. Eligible participants included medical or nursing students, doctors and nurses working in EDs. Data were collected electronically using Research Electronic Data...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tam, S. S. C., Zhang, Q., Wormald, J. C., Wilson, S., Gardiner, M. D., LANTERN Collaborative, Olszewska, Hatten, Hurt, Church-Martin, Lejonberg, Golash, Islam, Ghahfarokhi, Golash, Shewing, Cheong, Kamoga, Taylor, Sharma, Kiew, Fareed, Dankwa, Li, Goni, Harris, Alex, Elgendy, Tagdiwala, Shah, Wyatt, Lodi]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-18T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215891</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215891</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[National surveys on the use of local anaesthetic with adrenaline (LANTERN study) in the emergency setting]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215837v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215837v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in China has a high incidence and poor survival, highlighting an urgent need for rapid identification of reversible aetiologies. Conventional transthoracic echocardiography during resuscitation can be limited by imaging quality and prolonged chest compression interruptions. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a feasible alternative that allows for continuous real-time imaging during compressions, but its utility in Chinese OHCA patients remains uncertain.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This prospective, single-centre exploratory study enrolled 45 consecutive selected adults with non-traumatic OHCA (NT-OHCA) of unclear aetiology who were eligible for TEE. Of all enrolled patients, 43 completed standardised TEE image acquisition, while 2 cases with TEE-unrecognisable aetiology were excluded from aetiological analysis. The per-protocol analysis finally included 41 patients in whom TEE was successfully completed. Certified emergency physicians performed simplified TEE examinations (five standard views) during active resuscitation. Door-to-TEE interval, diagnostic yield, TEE-guided interventions and clinical outcomes were recorded according to Utstein guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>TEE yielded diagnostic-quality images in all patients (43/43), with a median door-to-TEE time of 13 min (IQR: 6.5&ndash;22). Reversible aetiologies were identified in 39.0% (16/41), most commonly acute aortic dissection (50.0%, 8/16), followed by massive pulmonary embolism (25.0%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18.8%) and hypovolaemia (6.3%). TEE guided interventions in 56.3% (9/16) of identified cases. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 28-day survival rates were 41.5% and 12.2%, respectively, with no significant differences between aetiology-identified and unidentified groups (ROSC: 37.5% vs 44.0%, p&gt;0.05; 28-day survival: 6.3% vs 16.0%, p&gt;0.05). Sensitivity analysis of the 43-case complete imaging cohort and the total 45 enrolled cases further verified the stability and reliability of the diagnostic results.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>During mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation, TEE rapidly identified suspected aetiologies in 39% (16/41) of NT-OHCA cases, notably revealing frequent acute aortic dissections. Lacking a comparator group, TEE&rsquo;s feasibility as a complementary tool requires further controlled investigation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Du, P., Liu, X., Zheng, Q., Lai, L., Liu, S., Lin, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-18T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215837</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215837</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Real-time identification of aetiology in patients able to undergo transoesophageal echocardiography with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in China: a prospective, single-centre exploratory study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215861v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Risk of obstructive acute kidney injury: derivation and internal validation of a risk stratification tree]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215861v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent condition among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Obstructive AKI constitutes a urological emergency requiring rapid diagnosis and intervention. The objective of this study was to derive and internally validate a predictive model of obstructive AKI in ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective derivation and internal validation cohort study. Adult patients presenting to the EDs of Toulouse University Hospital with AKI of any Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage between 1 July and 31 December 2019 were eligible. Included patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to a derivation cohort (DC) and an internal validation cohort (VC). The primary outcome was obstructive AKI, defined as hydronephrosis identified on imaging and requiring either urological intervention or Foley catheter insertion. A risk stratification decision tree was developed (Kidney Injury Tree For Identification of obSTructive Origin (KIT-FISTO) model).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The prevalence of obstructive AKI was 9% in the DC (64/727) and 7% in the VC (27/364). Patients presenting with lumbar, flank or hypogastric pain were classified as &lsquo;high risk&rsquo; in each cohort, with a corresponding obstructive AKI risk of 55% (95% CI 45% to 64%) and 54% (95% CI 39% to 69%), respectively. Patients without pain but with a history of urinary tract surgery, abdominal cancer, a solitary functional kidney or prostatic hyperplasia were classified as &lsquo;moderate risk&rsquo;, with obstructive AKI risks of 4% (95% CI 1% to 10%) and 2% (95% CI 0% to 12%), respectively. All remaining patients (&gt;70%) were classified as &lsquo;low risk&rsquo;, with an observed obstructive AKI risk of 0% (95% CI 0% to 1%). &lsquo;Low risk&rsquo; classification had a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 92% to 100%) and 96% (95% CI 81% to 100%), respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The KIT-FISTO was derived and internally validated to predict obstructive AKI in ED, but requires external and prospective validation before implementation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balen, F., Dubucs, X., Roux, C., Guy, P., Laclergerie, F., Game, X., Steinmeyer, Z., Tack, I., Charpentier, S., Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-18T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215861</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Risk of obstructive acute kidney injury: derivation and internal validation of a risk stratification tree]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215652v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex-based and gender-based details in accelerated diagnostic protocol implementation among emergency department patients presenting with chest pain: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215652v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Sex and gender influence how chest pain presents, how it is assessed and its outcomes, yet accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) used in emergency departments (EDs) largely ignore these differences. This systematic review assesses the extent to which sex-based and gender-based factors are addressed in studies implementing ADPs in EDs for adult patients presenting with chest pain.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Six electronic databases were searched from inception through 31 May 2024, for ED-based studies on ADP implementation in adults with suspected cardiac chest pain. Eligible study designs included randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, before/after studies and observational studies. Two reviewers independently screened articles for relevance and inclusion, with disagreements resolved by third-party adjudication. The primary outcome was the proportion of studies providing sex-disaggregated or gender-disaggregated analyses for key ED outcomes; secondary outcomes included the accuracy of sex and gender reporting per Canadian Institutes of Health Research definitions.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 19 455 records, 211 studies were included, predominantly prospective cohort designs (39%), with most data collected in ED settings (87%). While 95% reported participant sex, 76% did so appropriately; fewer than 20% considered sex or gender explicitly in their analyses or ADP applications. Gender was reported less frequently (37%) and reporting was largely inaccurate (92%). No studies presented sex-disaggregated or gender-disaggregated analyses for key ED outcomes (eg, length of stay, consultations, admissions, major adverse cardiac events). Regression analyses failed to identify significant increases in sex/gender reporting following major international sex-based and gender-based policy initiatives.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our findings highlight a critical need for improved and consistent integration of sex and gender in ED cardiac research. While most studies recognise the importance of sex differences, few explicitly addressed them, and even fewer considered the complexity of gender identities meaningfully. Future research should examine sex-specific and gender-specific troponin cut points, investigate at-risk groups and report disaggregated analyses of ED-relevant outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD42022380813.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Essel, N. O. M., Nathoo, H., Lesyk, N., Ushko, J., Dennett, L., Rowe, B. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-17T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215652</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215652</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex-based and gender-based details in accelerated diagnostic protocol implementation among emergency department patients presenting with chest pain: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215749v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prediction of bloodstream infection using triage variables in the emergency department: retrospective derivation and validation cohort]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215749v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Blood cultures are frequently performed in febrile emergency department (ED) patients despite low yield and risks of contamination. Existing prediction tools are not usable at triage. The objective was to derive and internally validate a score for predicting bloodstream infection using variables assessable immediately after ED triage.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This observational retrospective cohort study was conducted in the two EDs of a University Hospital between 1 January and 31 December 2021. Adult patients for whom a blood culture was collected during ED visit were included. The primary endpoint was bloodstream infection. A multivariate analysis using backward stepwise logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for bloodstream infection and derive the aGe, cOmplaint, Temperature and Hemodynamic for bloodstream Infection Classification (GOTHIC) score. Diagnostic accuracy of the score was evaluated in the derivation and validation cohorts.</p></sec><sec><st>Main results</st><p>6740 visits were analysed, including 4493 patients in the derivation cohort and 2247 patients in the validation cohort. The prevalence of bloodstream infection was 11% (n=512) and 10% (n=234) in each cohort, respectively. The GOTHIC score included seven factors associated with bloodstream infection: age &ge;75 years (OR=2.90; +1 point), tachycardia &gt;90 beats per minute (OR=1.51; +1 point), systolic blood pressure &lt;100 mm Hg (OR=1.90; +1 point), diastolic blood pressure &lt;60 mmvHg (OR=1.41; +1 point), fever &gt;38&deg;C (OR=2.14; +1 point), isolated fever as chief complaint at triage (OR=1.62; +1 point) and protective chief complaint (dyspnoea, COVID-19 symptoms or vaso-occlusive crisis) (OR=0.47; &ndash;1 point).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>We propose a simple risk score for bloodstream infection that can be easily calculated using seven variables assessable at triage.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Balen, F., Dubucs, X., Graciet, M., Dubois, D., Azema, O., Saivin, S., Viguier, C., Charpentier, S., Martin-Blondel, G., Thiruganasambandamoorthy, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215749</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215749</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prediction of bloodstream infection using triage variables in the emergency department: retrospective derivation and validation cohort]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216135v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[In adult patients with suspected sepsis, is adjunct resuscitation with human albumin solution associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes?]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216135v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A short systematic review was undertaken to answer the following three-part question: in adult patients with suspected sepsis, is adjunct resuscitation with human albumin solution (HAS) associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes? A systematic keyword search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases returned three relevant papers which were subsequently used in the final analysis. The author, year, country of publication, patient group studied, study type, key findings and study weaknesses are tabulated. The results suggest that resuscitation with HAS is not recommended in the emergency department in suspected sepsis and larger studies are required to address this clinical question.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phelan, H., Davie, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Best evidence topic reports]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[In adult patients with suspected sepsis, is adjunct resuscitation with human albumin solution associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Best Evidence Topic reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215623v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between the time to norepinephrine initiation and mortality in patients with sepsis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215623v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The optimal timing for initiating norepinephrine in sepsis remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the link between the timing of norepinephrine initiation (NE time) and the 28-day all-cause mortality in sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a prospective multicentre study. We recorded NE time, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate, the time to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) &gt;65 mm Hg, net fluid balance and lactate clearance. These parameters were compared between survivors and non-survivors. Cox regression analysis was used to determine their association with mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 138 patients were included in the study. Non-survivors had a longer median NE time (98.5 min (IQR 60.0&ndash;131) vs 49.5 min (IQR 25.5&ndash;75.0), p&lt;0.001) and a longer duration to reach the target MAP (80 min (IQR 30.0&ndash;217.5) vs 60 min (IQR 25.0&ndash;117.5), p=0.013) compared with survivors. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, NE time remained a predictor of 28-day all-cause mortality (adjusted HR=1.335, 95% CI 1.034 to 1.722, p=0.026). NE time exceeding 1 hour (adjusted HR=2.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 4.84, p=0.003) and 2 hours (adjusted HR=2.96, 95% CI 1.49 to 5.87, p=0.002) associated with increasing the risk of 28-day mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>NE time was associated with the 28-day all-cause mortality in sepsis patients. Commencing NE therapy within the first 60 min following the onset of hypotension was associated with a reduced risk of 28-day all-cause mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Trial registration number</st><p>TCTR20221103005.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thongkong, R., Morasert, T., Theerawit, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215623</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215623</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between the time to norepinephrine initiation and mortality in patients with sepsis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215411v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Same day emergency care for low back pain: quality improvement to support emergency flow and reduce unnecessary acute admissions]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215411v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Globally, patients with low back pain (LBP) account for 4.4% of all emergency department (ED) attendances, in the UK, 50 000 visits have been reported each month. LBP is reportedly challenging to manage in this setting. Consequently, hospital admission is common despite low numbers of serious pathology. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to reduce avoidable hospital admissions by implementing and embedding a same day emergency care (SDEC) pathway for LBP over a 2-year period.</p><p>A 12-bedded area was repurposed as an SDEC unit, staffed by specialist spinal nurses and a senior decision maker (advanced practice physiotherapist or spinal surgical fellow). The service was co-designed with key stakeholders, including spinal leadership, ED representatives, radiology and patients to form an ED-spinal interface group. The pathway was developed and refined over four plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles (2018&ndash;2021), supported by regular interface meetings and iterative feedback. Prospective data collection included referral activity, clinical timings, MRI utilisation and patient satisfaction. The project was registered as a QI initiative and did not require formal ethical approval.</p><p>Between November 2018 and December 2021, the spinal SDEC recorded 3921 referrals. PDSA cycle 1 (pilot) recorded 267 referrals with 82 (31%) admitted and 19 (7%) requiring same day MRI. PDSA cycle 2 (referral expansion) recorded 569 referrals with 177 (31%) admitted and 39 (7%) requiring same day MRI. PDSA cycle 3 (system engagement) recorded 1043 referrals with 119 (11%) admitted and 154 (15%) requiring same day MRI. PDSA cycle 4 (embedding SDEC) recorded 2042 patient referrals with only 8% (n=172) admitted and 224 (11%) requiring same day MRI. Across four improvement cycles, the spinal SDEC demonstrated progressive and sustained reductions in hospital admission without an apparent increase in demand for same day MRI.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dunstan, E., Wood, L., Coffey, F., Feavyour, J., Rashid, N., Salem, K., Hendrick, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-09T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215411</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215411</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Same day emergency care for low back pain: quality improvement to support emergency flow and reduce unnecessary acute admissions]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Quality improvement report</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215483v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ambulance offload delays and patient outcomes: a systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215483v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Ambulance offload delay, also known as ambulance ramping, is increasingly common in emergency care systems experiencing capacity strain. While such delays may have operational and clinical consequences, the extent of patient harm remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between ambulance offload delays and patient outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed research articles from inception to April 2025, alongside citation tracking. Eligible studies reported quantitative associations between offload delay and patient outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the MASTER scale for observational studies. Narrative synthesis and causal inference principles guided data interpretation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Four observational studies (three cohort, one case-control) met inclusion criteria from 420 screened articles, encompassing over 3 26 474 patients across Australia and Canada. Only one study reported a statistically significant increase in 30-day mortality with longer offload times, whereas the others found no difference or inconsistent effects. Three studies consistently reported longer emergency department (ED) length of stay in delayed patients. One study found a modest increase in 30-day repeat ambulance attendance. No studies assessed time to treatment or clinical deterioration. Definitions of offload delay varied widely (&ge;15 min to&ge;60 min), study populations differed in acuity and case mix, and risk adjustment was limited, with only one study incorporating pre-handover physiological measures. Risk of bias was moderate to high across all studies, largely due to incomplete control for baseline illness risk and system-level confounding, since higher-acuity patients are often prioritised for rapid offload.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Ambulance offload delays are consistently associated with prolonged ED stays, underscoring their significant operational burden on already strained health systems. However, direct evidence of clinical harm associated with offload delay remains unclear, largely due to methodological limitations and inconsistent definitions. Future research employing rigorous causal inference methods is urgently needed to determine whether ambulance offload delays directly contribute to adverse patient outcomes, thereby informing policies to strengthen timely and high-quality patient care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fouche, P. F., Stein, C., Nehme, Z., Strum, R. P., Seaman, G., Andrews, S., Shannon, B., Flanagan, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-04T02:30:11-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215483</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215483</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ambulance offload delays and patient outcomes: a systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215836v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Refreshing the paediatric emergency medicine research priorities across the UK and Ireland]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215836v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The original research priorities for paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) in the UK and Ireland were published in 2015. This list, generated through a modified Delphi process involving healthcare professionals only, has driven the research agenda for over ten years. With many now successfully addressed and a significantly altered healthcare landscape, there was a pressing need to refresh PEM research priorities with the input of patients and carers.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology was employed. The scope included unscheduled emergency care provided to children and young people irrespective of setting. An independent JLA facilitator chaired monthly steering group meetings with equal input from parents and healthcare professionals. Two online surveys were employed to generate a list of evidence uncertainties and then to prioritise research questions from key stakeholder groups (patients, carers and healthcare professionals). An online workshop subsequently used an adapted nominal group technique to reach a consensus on the top list of research priorities.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>655 questions were submitted in Survey 1 by 338 respondents (35% patients and carers and 65% healthcare professionals). After merging questions by topic and removing out-of-scope questions, 70 summary questions proceeded to evidence reviews; three were found to have been sufficiently answered. Further merging of summary questions resulted in 46 indicative research questions for Survey 2, which received 542 complete responses (26.6% patients and carers, 73.4% healthcare professionals). The 18 highest-ranking questions were brought to the consensus workshop, in which 12 patients/carers and 15 healthcare professionals reached consensus on the 10 highest priority research questions.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This refreshed PEM prioritisation study has identified the top 10 research priorities reflecting the views of patients, carers and a range of health professionals across the UK and Ireland. These priorities will be used to drive the PEM research agenda for the next decade.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane, C., Waterfield, T., Evans, J., Barrett, M., Lyttle, M. D., Mullen, N., performed on behalf of PERUKI, Charters, Buchanan, Sloane, Gregg, Evans, Ferris, Woolfall, Kirby, Walsh, Lee, Hill-Davis, Lyttle, Barrett, Prest, Mullen, Bonsor, Edwards, Wolffs, Hartshorn, Waterfield, Herrera, Abdin, Fisher, Sloane, McCleary, Fisher, Norman-Bruce, Groves, Drummond, Evans, Abdelhafiz, Jenkins, McKenna, Krishnaswamy, Mullen, Rodgers, Ravenscroft, Zuhairi, O'Hagan, Messahel, Waterfield, McNiffe, Preston, Webster, Warrington, Cleland, McCormick, Lewis, Cope, Edwards, Stewart, Salt, Norman-Bruce, Browning, Marouf, Coveney, Evans, Maney, Byrne, Ellis, Jemmett, Atima, Suchanek, Glusek, Henderson, Foster, Joseph, Mullaney]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215836</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215836</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Refreshing the paediatric emergency medicine research priorities across the UK and Ireland]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214235v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Frugal and reverse innovations in emergency medicine: a concepts piece]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214235v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We suggest that low-cost innovations, termed as frugal, when diffused from low-income and middle-income countries to high-income countries, offer an opportunity to diversify sources of ideas and solutions in emergency medicine. We outline examples from a preliminary search of the literature, consider the barriers faced by such innovations and suggest what needs to be done to improve their chances of being considered for use in emergency medicine.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asfand-E-Yar, B., Jafar, A. J. N., Harris, M., Weber, E. J., Bhatti, Y. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-01T09:00:20-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214235</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214235</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[COVID-19]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Frugal and reverse innovations in emergency medicine: a concepts piece]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215916v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fitness to practise concerns and outcomes in UK emergency medicine doctors 2020-2024]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215916v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Emergency medicine (EM) is increasingly delivered under conditions of crowding, exit block and care in non-traditional clinical spaces, often described as &lsquo;corridor care&rsquo;.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Therefore it is plausible that clinicians fear system-driven deviations from ideal care could expose them to referral to the General Medical Council (GMC). The GMC is the UK regulator for doctors. Concerns may be raised by the public or professionals and can be closed at triage, returned to local employers or escalated for investigation. Outcomes range from no action to erasure from the medical register. Investigations that proceed may culminate in a fitness to practise (FtP) hearing, conducted by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS). Despite increasing attention around &lsquo;corridor care&rsquo;, there is limited evidence examining FtP outcomes for EM specialists. GMC register data indicate approximately 4320 doctors on the EM specialist register and 208 on the Paediatric Emergency Medicine register.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> This retrospective...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edwards, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215916</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215916</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fitness to practise concerns and outcomes in UK emergency medicine doctors 2020-2024]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214159v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accuracy of major trauma triage using the MATTS tool: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214159v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>The Major Trauma Triage Study (&lsquo;MATTS&rsquo;) triage tool was designed to identify patients with major trauma who could benefit from expedited care in specialist major trauma centres (MTCs). We aimed to investigate the impact of the MATTS tool on major trauma triage decisions after implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Consecutive patients were included in a multicentre, prospective cohort study conducted between 1 November 2021 and 15 May 2022 in six trauma networks served by West Midlands and Yorkshire Ambulance Services. Electronic data from ambulance service patient report forms were linked to data from the Trauma Audit and Research Network trauma registry. The accuracy of prehospital triage decisions (conveyance to an MTC with pre-alert) against a bespoke MATTS reference standard to define major trauma was calculated. This was compared with optimal undertriage/overtriage trade-off indicated by previous economic modelling. Additional analyses investigated theoretical triage tool accuracy based on recorded data irrespective of hospital destination, examined important injury subgroups, evaluated alternative reference standards and described triage tool use.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 38 010 injured patients were included, with 2.2% prevalence of major trauma. The MATTS triage tool demonstrated 55.3% sensitivity (95% CI 51.8% to 58.7%) and 94.3% specificity (95% CI 94.1% to 94.6%). There was evidence of triage tool use in a minority of patients (6.3%), with senior clinical advice sought in 9.3% of patients. Theoretical triage tool sensitivity was 51.1% (95% CI 47.6% to 54.5%) with specificity 93.6% (95% CI 92.7% to 94.4%). Agreement between the theoretical triage tool result and the observed triage decision was good (absolute agreement 90.4%, Gwet&rsquo;s agreement coefficient 1 (AC1) statistic 0.89, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.89). Accuracy varied across different ages, mechanisms of injury subgroups and alternative reference standards for major trauma.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The MATTS triage tool achieved an appropriate undertriage/overtriage trade-off compared with previously established targets. However, documented adherence to MATTS was low. Dedicated training and further evaluation are necessary prior to national wider implementation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fuller, G., Baird, J., Herbert, E., Keating, S., Miller, J., Pilbery, R., Turner, J., Lecky, F., Edwards, A., Rosser, A., Callaghan, T., Bell, F., Smyth, M., Smith, J. E., Perkins, G. D., Reid, S., Millins, M., Walters, S. J., Cooper, C., MATTS Research Group, Maconochie, Ward, Turton, Waterhouse, Stevenson, Pollard, Pandor, Charles]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214159</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214159</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accuracy of major trauma triage using the MATTS tool: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216076v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is ultrasound superior to plain radiography for detecting radiolucent soft tissue foreign bodies in the extremities?]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216076v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A short systematic review was undertaken to assess whether ultrasound is superior to plain radiography for detecting radiolucent soft-tissue foreign bodies in the extremities. A structured search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases identified six relevant papers. The author, year, country, study type, patient characteristics, key results and study weaknesses were tabulated. The included studies demonstrated high sensitivity of ultrasound (90%&ndash;99%) for detecting radiolucent foreign bodies, whereas plain radiography detected none in the comparative studies. However, most studies were small, single-centre and involved experienced operators, which limited generalisability. Overall, ultrasound appears superior to plain radiography for radiolucent foreign bodies, although larger prospective comparative studies are needed to strengthen recommendations.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Philippou, P., Darbyshire, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-25T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216076</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216076</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Best evidence topic reports]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is ultrasound superior to plain radiography for detecting radiolucent soft tissue foreign bodies in the extremities?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Best Evidence Topic reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216031v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modified brain injury guidelines in a regional Australian setting indicate significant resource savings but also safety concerns]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216031v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of emergency department (ED) presentation globally and accounts for more than 60% of trauma-related deaths.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> In Australia, TBI represents 1.3%&ndash;2% of all ED presentations, with a hospitalised incidence of 99.1 per 100 000 population.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Although most TBIs are mild and fewer than 1% require neurosurgical intervention,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> many patients receive neurosurgical consultations (NSCs), repeat CT scans or inter-hospital transfers, reflecting considerable resource use. In New South Wales (NSW), guidelines mandate NSC for any abnormal CT brain, leading to high use of NSCs.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) and modified BIG (mBIG), developed in the USA, aim to safely reduce imaging, consultations and admissions by stratifying TBI severity.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5 6</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6"></cross-ref> These pathways have demonstrated improved resource use without compromising outcomes<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> but have not been evaluated in Australia. This study aimed to assess the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doig, M., Soeyland, T., Thomson, D., Zibold, F., Grant, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216031</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216031</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modified brain injury guidelines in a regional Australian setting indicate significant resource savings but also safety concerns]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215770v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Point-of-care ultrasound by trained emergency physicians versus radiologists for deep vein thrombosis diagnosis: a prospective blinded study on diagnostic accuracy and time efficiency]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215770v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and time-to-diagnosis of compression ultrasonography performed by emergency physicians compared with radiologist-performed Doppler ultrasonography in patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this prospective blinded study, 309 patients with suspected lower-extremity DVT presenting to a tertiary emergency department between November 2022 and October 2024 were evaluated. All patients underwent compression ultrasonography performed by trained emergency physicians followed by radiologist-performed Doppler ultrasonography as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% CIs. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen&rsquo;s kappa coefficient.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>DVT was confirmed in 33/309 patients (10.6%). Emergency physician-performed compression ultrasonography demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.0% (95% CI 84.2 to 99.9) and specificity of 99.3% (95% CI 97.4 to 99.9). The PPV was 94.1% (95% CI 80.3 to 99.3) and the NPV was 99.6% (95% CI 98.0 to 100). Interobserver agreement between emergency physicians and radiologists was excellent across evaluated venous segments, with Cohen&rsquo;s kappa values of 0.926 (95% CI 0.880 to 0.971) for the femoral vein, 0.907 (95% CI 0.855 to 0.958) for the saphenofemoral junction and 0.973 (95% CI 0.947 to 0.999) for the popliteal vein. The median workflow-based time-to-diagnosis was 1 hour (IQR 0.75&ndash;1.5) for emergency physician-performed ultrasound and 4 hours (IQR 3&ndash;6) for radiologist-performed ultrasound.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Compression ultrasonography performed by trained emergency physicians demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and excellent agreement with radiologist-performed Doppler ultrasonography in patients with suspected DVT. Bedside ultrasound was also associated with shorter workflow-based time-to-diagnosis. These findings support further evaluation of whether earlier bedside diagnosis may translate into clinically meaningful outcomes such as reduced emergency department length of stay and improved patient flow.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Koylu, R., Kadioglu, E., Tayiz, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215770</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215770</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Point-of-care ultrasound by trained emergency physicians versus radiologists for deep vein thrombosis diagnosis: a prospective blinded study on diagnostic accuracy and time efficiency]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215778v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Basis of the first Palestinian trauma registry: a multicentre retrospective chart review from the West Bank]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215778v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>The Global Burden of Disease Study has showcased the global impact of trauma, but underrepresented low- and middle-income countries lacking a trauma registry (TR), where 90% of injury-related deaths occur with the highest rate of disabilities and trauma care limitations.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref></p><p>Traumatic injury is the seventh cause of death in Palestine, yet remains unexplored.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> The trauma care pathway in Palestine, particularly Gaza, has been severely compromised by the ongoing conflict, movement restrictions and limited resources. Relevant studies report inadequate documentation as another obstacle in Palestinian trauma care.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3 4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref></p><p>We have formed a directory of trauma in the West Bank as the basis of the first Palestinian TR, labelled PTR1. Our group will disseminate our findings to describe this unique landscape of injury while informing local and global health decisions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Methodology</st><p>This study is a retrospective chart review of trauma entries. Given its...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bael, P., Abu Ghattas, Z., Albedd, A., Istefan, S., Itmaiza, M., Alqtishat, B., Qumsieh, N., Al-Shobaki, T., Hallak, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-21T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215778</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215778</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Basis of the first Palestinian trauma registry: a multicentre retrospective chart review from the West Bank]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-21</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214819v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experiences and mental challenges of Turkish healthcare professionals in the Libyan flood disaster: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214819v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The provision of aid services in the context of disasters can also give rise to a range of physical and psychological issues among healthcare professionals. Such circumstances have the potential to negatively impact both their well-being and professional performance. However, their difficulty in expressing all of their experiences makes it difficult to understand this situation in depth. This study aims to explore in depth the experiences and mental challenges faced by Turkish health professionals during the Libyan flood disaster.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This was a qualitative study involving 10 health workers who had been involved in disaster response following the floods. The flood occurred on 10 September 2023. Data were collected between March and August 2024 through semi-structured interviews conducted either online or face-to-face in the participants&rsquo; homes. This timeframe enabled participants to articulate both their immediate reactions to the disaster and its longer-term effects on their personal and professional lives. An interpretive phenomenological approach was employed using Colaizzi&rsquo;s phenomenological analysis technique.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The analysis revealed four principal themes. First, healthcare professionals emphasised the essential knowledge and skills required to provide effective care and treatment in the context of the flood. Second, they reported substantial physical challenges in the disaster zone, such as limited resources and disrupted infrastructure. Third, they described the profound mental challenges they faced, including stress, fear and emotional exhaustion. Finally, participants highlighted various coping strategies they employed to manage these difficulties and sustain their professional performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The study revealed that Turkish healthcare professionals who volunteered after the floods in Libya experienced not only physical challenges such as lack of resources, infrastructure problems and security concerns, but also psychological challenges such as secondary trauma and burnout. Furthermore, it was observed that not only professional knowledge and skills but also the capacity to cope with traumatic experiences are decisive in the effectiveness of disaster response processes. The study underscores the necessity for the implementation of psychosocial support and training programmes for professionals, with the objective of accelerating both individual and societal recovery processes following disasters.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sahin, M., Salik, H., Uslu, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-19T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214819</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214819</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experiences and mental challenges of Turkish healthcare professionals in the Libyan flood disaster: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215217v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[E(co)-health evolution: comparative life-cycle assessment of the virtual fracture clinic versus conventional inperson follow-up]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215217v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The Virtual Fracture Care (VFC) method is designed to minimise follow-up visits for trauma patients seen in the emergency department (ED) with non-complex and stable injuries by adopting a risk-sharing model. Given the healthcare sector&rsquo;s significant carbon footprint, this study aims to assess the environmental impact of VFC-pathway direct discharge with the standard pathway with inpatient follow-up, focusing on the treatment and follow-up of torus/greenstick fractures.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A comparative cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment was conducted at a Dutch ED. Data for material use, waste, packaging, transport, energy consumption, and staff and patient travel are included. Carbon footprints were calculated using SimaPro software with the ReCiPe 2016 method. The study compared the carbon footprints of the VFC pathway and standard pathway, identified key contributors, and performed a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The VFC pathway resulted in a reduction of 2.8 (95% CI 2.1 to 3.9) kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas emissions (kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-eq) per treatment compared with the standard pathway, which equates to an annual decrease of 625 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-equivalents in 230 patients seen in our hospital. Key contributors to the difference in annual emissions were travel movements (411.7 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-eq), materials (126.5 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-eq) and packaging (6.9 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-eq). Sensitivity analysis revealed that eliminating follow-up visits could result in an annual reduction of 805 kg CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB>-eq, if all patients travelled by car.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The VFC pathway reduces the CO<SUB><SUB>2</SUB></SUB> emission of treating torus/greenstick fractures, primarily by decreasing patient travel, while patient satisfaction and material use do not increase. Broader adoption of a risk-sharing model, that is digitally supported, may reduce environmental impact across healthcare domains.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lub, F. T., van Vlijmen, N. F. M., van Bree, E. M., Snijder, L., Twigt, B., Baden, D. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-17T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215217</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215217</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[E(co)-health evolution: comparative life-cycle assessment of the virtual fracture clinic versus conventional inperson follow-up]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215194v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of patients with suspected but unidentified poisoning in the emergency department: a joint Royal College of Emergency Medicine and National Poisons Information Service best practice guideline]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215194v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The management of patients suspected, but not confirmed, as being poisoned is challenging. The Royal College of Emergency Medicine and National Poisons Information Service have produced this guidance to provide a generalised clinical approach to any poisoned patient in the emergency department. This guideline provides a clinical approach to support the initial assessment of a patient, identification of potential toxic agents and emergency management. A toxidromic approach is used, with emphasis on consideration of the toxicokinetics of potential poisons and how the patient&rsquo;s clinical condition may change. It does not replace poison-specific guidance available from TOXBASE and the NPIS or a locally appropriate poisons centre.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Welby-Everard, P., Pucci, M., Bradberry, S., Dargan, P., Veiraiah, A., Thanacoody, R., Elamin, M. E. M. O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215194</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215194</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of patients with suspected but unidentified poisoning in the emergency department: a joint Royal College of Emergency Medicine and National Poisons Information Service best practice guideline]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215189v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[On the optimal sodium correction rate in hyponatraemia and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215189v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Hyponatraemia is associated with greater mortality in emergency patients. Therefore, the correction of low serum sodium levels remains an important field in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Eligible studies were searched through a literature query in PubMed and Web of Science in August 2024. Sodium correction rates and mortality data were extracted. The articles were grouped based on the threshold used to distinguish between slow and rapid correction. For each group, a random effects model was used for meta-analysis. The sodium correction rate thresholds were 8, 10 and 12 mmol/L/24 hours. Additionally, a random effects model was used to estimate the difference in osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS) incidence.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>11 retrospective studies with a total of 27 672 cases were included in the meta-analysis, each scoring at least 8* on the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment score. Mortality was significantly lower in the rapid correction group compared with the slow correction group for the 8 mmol/L/day threshold (OR: 0.398, p&lt;0.001), for 10 mmol/L/day (OR: 0.489, p&lt;0.001) and for 12 mmol/L/day (OR: 0.57, p&lt;0.001). Overall incidence of ODS was low (0.085%), but it was higher in the rapid correction group (OR: 3.959, p=0.002).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Within all three thresholds of sodium correction, rapid correction was associated with improved survival. Although no causal relation can be concluded, a more liberal approach to sodium correction rate in hyponatraemia may be beneficial. However, osmotic demyelination remains a serious, although very rare, issue.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matrisch, L., Rau, Y., Grasshoff, L., Nitschke, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-07T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[On the optimal sodium correction rate in hyponatraemia and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215154v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preinjury, injury and post-injury factors leading to death in children and young people who were victims of knife crime in England between 2019 and 2024: a review of the National Child Mortality Database]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215154v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Knife-related deaths in children present a serious public health challenge. This study reports the demographics and preinjury, injury and postinjury factors associated with death in children and young people (CYP), under the age of 18 years, who died of knife wounds in England between 2019 and 2024.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective cohort review of the English National Child Mortality Database between April 2019 and March 2024. Rates of death were corrected for population size using the 2021 census. Preinjury, injury and postinjury factors associated with death are reported descriptively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>145 CYP died of knife wounds. The mean age was 14.4 years (SD 4.2) and 90.3% (n=131) were male. The rates of death per 100 000 CYP, per year were highest in children of &lsquo;Black/Black British&rsquo; ethnicity (1.40 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.86)), with an incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 13.29 (95% CI 8.23 to 20.00), compared with CYP of &lsquo;White&rsquo; ethnicity. Children living in the most deprived areas, had a greater than seven times higher risk of death (IRR 7.48 (95% CI 3.22 to 17.29), compared to CYP living in the least deprived areas. Of the 57 cases available for detailed analysis, injuries to the chest and neck were responsible for the fatal injuries in 75.9% of cases (n=44) and 60.3% (n=35) died before reaching hospital. A thoracotomy was performed in 56.9% (n=33) of cases. Prior to death, 75.4% (n=43) had been known to social services and 57.9% (n=33) had experienced domestic violence and abuse. Neurodiversity or mental health concerns were reported in 50.9% (n=29) of CYP.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Death of CYP secondary to knife wounds occurred in all regions of England. Many children are exposed to adverse childhood experiences before death and known to statutory services. The identification of interventions to decrease the risk to children from knife violence remains a priority.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberts, T., Odd, D., Coveney, J., Webster, S., Levell, J., Stoianova, S., Sleap, V., Williams, T., Marlow, R., Luyt, K., Carlton, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T09:00:27-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215154</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215154</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access, Press releases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preinjury, injury and post-injury factors leading to death in children and young people who were victims of knife crime in England between 2019 and 2024: a review of the National Child Mortality Database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215135v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prehospital prediction of clinical course in patients with suspected sepsis: a prospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215135v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Early prediction of the clinical course may aid clinical decisions for patients with suspected sepsis. We examined how variables observed by ambulance personnel predicted the clinical course in patients with suspected sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We prospectively collected prehospital data from patients with suspected sepsis in the ambulance service and supplemented the data with in-hospital findings. Prehospital data were used to calculate outputs of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS2). Outcomes were (1) sepsis severity after hospital admission, measured by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score; (2) development of septic shock, defined by need for intravenous fluid resuscitation and pressors; and (3) 30-day all-cause mortality. Factors that predicted the three outcomes were identified with regression analysis. We performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to find the discriminatory abilities of prehospital scores.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We included 398 patients with a median age of 76 years and a 30-day all-cause mortality of 10.1%. Oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure and qSOFA were associated with sepsis severity and septic shock; Glasgow Coma Score and male sex with sepsis severity and mortality; age with sepsis severity; ashen or marbled skin and focus of infection with septic shock; cyanosis, nursing home resident and comorbidity with mortality. No variable predicted all three outcomes. Area under the curve (AUC) for septic shock was higher for qSOFA than for NEWS2 (p=0.033). AUC for septic shock was higher for males than for females if NEWS2 score was used (p=0.049), indicating that NEWS2 is better at predicting shock among males compared with females.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>While there may be a role for the use of prehospital scoring systems in patients who are critically ill on presentation, established clinical decision aids must be used with caution and predictive information is lost if the tools are applied alone.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersson, L.-J., Simonsen, G. S., Solligard, E., Fredriksen, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215135</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215135</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prehospital prediction of clinical course in patients with suspected sepsis: a prospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215673v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinical decision rules for obtaining chest radiography in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215673v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Chest pain is the second leading emergency department (ED) presentation, with its associated diagnostics requiring ED resource utilisation. Radiography is used in 70% of cases but identifies clinically significant findings in only 1.5%&ndash;2.1%. The predominance of non-actionable imaging results, combined with paucity of decision rules, prompted this systematic review to inform the development of a new clinical decision rule (CDR).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Four bibliographical databases were searched, including: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE. Study selection, extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers via Covidence. Studies using a shared clinical decision tool were pooled to calculate sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and false-positive rates using Meta-DiSc V.2.0. Univariate and, where possible, bivariate analyses generated forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristics curves. Heterogeneity was quantified by I&sup2;, and methodological bias assessed via the Prediction model study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 626 records, 7 studies (6654 ED patients, Canada, Australia, USA) met inclusion. Of these, further analysis was undertaken of four validation studies. Two studies examined the Hess CDR reporting 98.3% sensitivity (95% CI 17% to 100%) and 47.6% specificity (95% CI 43.8% to 51.3%). Two studies examined the Rothrock CDR and reported 88.6% sensitivity (95% CI 80.1% to 93.7%) and 73% specificity (95% CI 17.7% to 97.2%). Hess had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.04 (95% CI 0 to 9.17) compared with Rothrock (0.156, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.38) and Rothrock had a positive likelihood ratio of 3.3 (95% CI 0.52 to 20.95) compared with Hess (1.9, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.11). Meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity with low bias as per PROBAST criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis of two chest X-ray decision rules for non-traumatic chest pain found the Hess <I>et al</I> rule more sensitive but unlikely to reduce imaging. Evidence is limited by few studies, high heterogeneity and retrospective cohorts. Neither rule is recommendable, highlighting the need for prospective derivation using established methodological standards.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Al Fathil, Y., Rotella, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215673</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215673</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinical decision rules for obtaining chest radiography in adult patients presenting to the emergency department with non-traumatic chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215617v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding how language barriers in the paediatric emergency care setting influences safety of care delivery: a scoping review]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215617v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Communication in a family&rsquo;s primary language can support safe care. Vital steps within the care delivery process are contingent on successful communication, including reporting symptoms, clinical decision-making, informed consent, discharge communication and follow-up coordination. The importance of effective information exchange is particularly pronounced in paediatric emergency care, and complex interactions may arise as parents or carers advocate on behalf of children. This scoping review aimed to identify and map existing research indicating where along the care journey communication-related risks for safety lie during paediatric emergency care and what strategies exist to mitigate them.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library for studies which examined the influence of language barriers on patient safety in paediatric emergency care as well as studies that evaluated interventions. Bibliographic database searches were executed on 18 December 2024; retrieved records were independently screened by two authors at title and abstract level followed by full text level. Data on study objectives, population characteristics, study design and their key findings were extracted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>1578 articles were identified, of which 33 were included and mapped according to (i) studies reporting safety risks linked to language barriers in paediatric emergency care (n=24) and (ii) existing interventions designed to mitigate these risks (n=9). Studies highlighted that language barriers can influence safety at multiple stages of the emergency care pathway, with discharge most frequently reported as a point of risk for paediatric patient safety. Interventions focused primarily on usage, uptake and documentation of professional interpreter services.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Addressing misunderstandings around follow-up and home-care advice during medical safety netting are priority areas for intervention. Future research should involve carer and clinical perspectives in exploring whether technology-enabled tools, including artificial intelligence, can safely mitigate language barriers in these situations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Odedra, R., Averill, P., Nijman, R. G., Wiemker, V., Hariharan, B., Mayer, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-04T09:00:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215617</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215617</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding how language barriers in the paediatric emergency care setting influences safety of care delivery: a scoping review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215376v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Endovascular resuscitation: an expert practice review]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215376v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Endovascular resuscitation (EVR) describes a collection of novel therapies that aim to bridge patients in shock states or cardiac arrest to definitive treatment, through a combination of haemorrhage control and mechanical circulatory support. The last half-decade has seen landmark trials report on several techniques and adoption is growing despite controversies around risk, efficacy and implementation. As leaders in resuscitation, it is essential that emergency physicians understand the principles and practice of endovascular techniques to advocate for the critically unwell patients that may benefit from EVR and be engaged in future implementation.</p><p>This practice review aims to provide emergency physicians with an overview of EVR, based around case scenarios of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and non-compressible haemorrhage. We review the rationale for EVR in these conditions and describe the critical initial step of vascular access. We then describe the physiology, technique, efficacy and safety of three escalating interventions: resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta, selective aortic arch perfusion and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adams, T. D., Barratt, J., Manning, J. E., Rees, P., Singer, B., Barnard, E. B. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-30T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215376</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215376</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Endovascular resuscitation: an expert practice review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215822v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A systemic concern with arterial blood gas analysers in patients with increased temperatures that has the potential to adversely impact on patient care: an observational study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215822v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Measurement of blood gases is one of the most important analytical tests used to assess critically ill patients. As fever is well recognised to modify blood gas measurements,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> blood gas machine derived parameters, including pH, depend on imputation of a patient&rsquo;s current temperature. This, in turn, allows an algorithm to modify the blood gas analyser output, providing a temperature-corrected value.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> We explored the potential impact that inadvertently using the inaccurate temperature-uncorrected pH would have on clinical decision-making compared with using the temperature-corrected pH.</p><p>We conducted a cohort study in all patients admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust between 1 February 2020 and 31 December 2021 for a COVID-19 related admission. Arterial blood gas values were analysed. Temperature was recorded from blood gas machines and clinical systems. Patient temperatures inputted into the blood gas machine were available in the same database as...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crooks, C. J., West, J., Morling, J. R., Simmonds, M., Juurlink, I., Briggs, S., Cruickshank, S., Hammond-Pears, S., Gazis, T., Shaw, D., Card, T. R., Fogarty, A. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215822</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215822</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A systemic concern with arterial blood gas analysers in patients with increased temperatures that has the potential to adversely impact on patient care: an observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215904v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haematoma block versus sedation for manipulating distal radius fractures in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215904v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Distal radius fractures commonly require manipulation in the emergency department. Procedural sedation is frequently used but is resource-intensive and associated with potential adverse events. Haematoma block may offer a practical alternative, particularly in busy emergency departments, but its comparative efficacy and safety are uncertain.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate whether haematoma block provides a comparable procedural success rate to procedural sedation, and whether there is a difference in the likelihood of adverse events, in adult patients undergoing manipulation of distal radius fractures in the emergency department.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A structured search of MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted using the Ovid interface. Studies comparing haematoma block with procedural sedation for manipulation of distal radius fractures in adults were included. Outcomes assessed included procedural success rate and adverse events. Seven studies met inclusion criteria, comprising four randomised controlled trials and three observational studies. Two studies were derived from the same dataset and were combined in the Best Evidence Topic (BET) table as one.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Across the included studies, there was no consistent evidence of a difference in procedural success between haematoma block and procedural sedation. The highest-quality evidence from two randomised controlled trials found no difference in radiographic outcome. Regarding the likelihood of adverse events when comparing haematoma block versus sedation, one study found less pain in the haematoma block group. None of the other studies detected a statistically significant difference.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In adult patients presenting to the emergency department with distal radius fractures requiring manipulation, the use of haematoma blocks appears to be associated with comparable procedural success rate to procedural sedation, without strong evidence of a difference in likelihood of adverse events.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fox, A., Nell, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215904</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215904</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Best evidence topic reports]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haematoma block versus sedation for manipulating distal radius fractures in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Best Evidence Topic reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216019v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[3-foot world in emergency medicine: attentional narrowing as adaptive paradox]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216019v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>A case in point</st><p>Several days following anterior neck surgery, a middle-aged patient on therapeutic anticoagulation developed acute respiratory failure following extubation. Attempts at reintubation by the anaesthetic team were unsuccessful. The emergency physician (EP), responding as part of the hospital cardiac arrest team, found the patient cyanotic with rapidly deteriorating oxygen saturations. An emergency surgical airway was indicated, yet extensive anterior cervical oedema and postoperative distortion from the surgical approach had obliterated all recognisable surface landmarks.</p><p>Using basic code cart instruments, the EP began a procedure previously performed only in laboratory settings.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> As the scalpel entered tissue, the cardiac monitor showed ventricular fibrillation, then asystole. He continued&mdash;there was no alternative. His visual field narrowed dramatically. The room&mdash;sounds, people, the monitor&mdash;faded. His perceptual world contracted to the surgical field.</p><p>Time distorted. The procedure felt interminable, perhaps fifteen minutes. When his finger entered the trachea and the tube was passed, the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iserson, K. V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216019</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216019</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[3-foot world in emergency medicine: attentional narrowing as adaptive paradox]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215905v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Are rapid diagnostic tests reliable for the detection of malaria in the emergency department?]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215905v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A short systematic review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of malaria rapid diagnostic tests in febrile adults from malaria-endemic regions. A database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar returned 138 papers. Six papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in our analysis.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moran, C., Coyne, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215905</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215905</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Best evidence topic reports, Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Are rapid diagnostic tests reliable for the detection of malaria in the emergency department?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Best Evidence Topic reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215840v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pragmatic medicine, n=1]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215840v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Many practising clinicians have voiced concerns about limitations and imperfections associated with evidence-based medicine. Some of those concerns are aimed at the methodology and objectives of present-day medical research; others are a reflection of diverse environments and populations in which medical care is delivered. We argue in this paper that absence of evidence for any particular approach does not equate with evidence of absence of benefit of a considered intervention. Sufficient rather than perfect solutions may reflect patient preference or contextual constraints rather than ignorance on the part of the clinical practitioner. Relying on evidence without applying clinical judgement may sometimes be inappropriate. Medicine that acknowledges gaps in evidence needs to be pragmatic, seeking a solution for the patient in front of us.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szawarski, P., Hillebrandt, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215840</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215840</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pragmatic medicine, n=1]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215110v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[External validation of the emergency CT head score to reduce non-trauma imaging: a multicentre retrospective study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215110v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Cerebral CT (CCT) is used in emergency departments (EDs) to assess suspected central nervous system disorders, particularly neurovascular issues. However, the increasing use of CCT raises concerns regarding cost, radiation exposure and efficiency, prompting the development of clinical scoring systems to guide informed decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging. The Emergency CT Head Score (ECHS) is a recent tool designed to streamline CCT prescriptions using four criteria: neurological deficit, acute headache, seizures with altered consciousness and transient neurological disorders. This study aimed to validate the ECHS in a different population and healthcare system in France while also providing a detailed cost analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This multicentre retrospective study, conducted in two EDs in Normandy, included adults (&ge;18years) presenting with non-rotatory vertigo, acute headache, altered consciousness, seizures, confusion, dizziness, syncope or presyncope without recent trauma who underwent CCT. Exclusion criteria were suspected stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) according to French guidelines, head trauma, brain cancer, hydrocephalus, recent stroke or minors. No follow-up was performed. The ECHS was calculated retrospectively and compared with CT findings.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 600 included patients, the mean age was 62.4&plusmn;18.7 years and 86 (14.3%) showed abnormalities on CT. The ECHS score demonstrated strong performance, with an area under the curve of 0.894 (95% CI 0.849 to 0.940). Using a threshold of ECHS&ge;1, we observed no false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 95.8% to 100%) and negative predictive value of 100% (95 % CI 98.2% to 100%). At this threshold, 48% of CCT scans could have been avoided without adverse outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The ECHS demonstrated high sensitivity for detecting CT abnormalities in this cohort, suggesting potential to reduce unnecessary scans in patients with a score of 0. However, prospective implementation studies are needed.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seingier, R., Pasco, J., Hanouz, J.-L., Macrez, R., Goetz, M., Amiot, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215110</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215110</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[External validation of the emergency CT head score to reduce non-trauma imaging: a multicentre retrospective study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215099v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management and outcomes of critically ill patients admitted to a critical care resuscitation unit: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215099v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Providing early support to critically ill patients before intensive care unit (ICU) admission improves morbidity and mortality. We aimed to evaluate the management and outcomes of critically ill patients admitted to a critical care resuscitation unit (CCRU).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This retrospective study was conducted in the CCRU of a tertiary hospital and included adults (&ge;18 years) admitted from November 2015 until March 2020 and from July 2021 until December 2023. The primary outcome was the disposition category at CCRU discharge. Comparisons with a historical control group of critically ill emergency department (ED) patients prior to CCRU implementation were made.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>2059 CCRU patients (median age 70 years; 57.4% male) were analysed. Patients were admitted to the CCRU from the ED (72.2%), wards (18%), emergency medical services (6.7%) or other sources (3.2%). Following a median CCRU length of stay of 2.7 (IQR 1.7&ndash;4.2) hours, during which 2 (IQR 1&ndash;4) critical care interventions per patient were delivered, 911 patients (44.2%) required ICU admission, while 978 (47.5%) and 74 (3.6%) patients were admitted to general wards or discharged home. 84 patients (4.1%) died in the CCRU. Compared with a historical control group, the ICU admission rate of ED patients (0.73 vs 0.56%, p&lt;0.001) and the delay between ED presentation and ICU or CCRU admission decreased after CCRU implementation (1.87 (0.48&ndash;6.53) vs 0.85 (0.48&ndash;2.79) hours, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The CCRU at a large tertiary centre admitted critically ill patients with a wide range of emergencies. Following a short treatment period, during which several critical care interventions were delivered, less than half of CCRU patients required subsequent ICU admission. Comparisons with a historical control group suggest that CCRU implementation reduced the ICU admission rate and time to initiation of critical care for ED patients.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noitz, M., Jenny, D., Steininger, F., Tschoellitsch, T., Erblich, R., Kno&#x0308;ll, M., Meier, J., Du&#x0308;nser, M. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215099</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215099</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management and outcomes of critically ill patients admitted to a critical care resuscitation unit: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215220v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinician interaction with a machine learning algorithm for the assessment of patients with possible acute heart failure: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215220v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Machine learning (ML) could improve clinical decisions in patients with possible acute heart failure, but few studies have evaluated acceptance, and barriers or facilitators that lead to clinician engagement with these tools. In a qualitative study, we used anonymised clinical cases of breathless patients to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement with a clinical decision-support tool&mdash;&lsquo;CoDE-HF&rsquo;&mdash;that applies ML to estimate the probability of acute heart failure from natriuretic peptide concentrations and clinical variables.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Emergency department clinicians across three acute care hospitals were invited to participate in 1:1 semi-structured interviews either face-to-face or by video call. Clinicians were asked to review five anonymised clinical cases and &lsquo;think aloud&rsquo; about patient assessment strategies and interpretation of the Collaboration for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Heart Failure (CoDE-HF) model outputs. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded. Codes were mapped onto the four domains of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influences, facilitating conditions) which was used to identify barriers and facilitators to acceptance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Facilitators to use were CoDE-HF&rsquo;s ability to promote objective communication between colleagues and its role in reprioritising acute heart failure in cases where a diagnosis may have been missed. The method of presentation of model output (statements relating to the positive or negative predictive value of the CoDE-HF output score and visual traffic light system for the low-probability, intermediate-probability or high-probability categories) was viewed as facilitators, though the absolute numerical score was more difficult to interpret. Access to a computer and clinical sample processing time were the only potential organisational issues identified as barriers.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Clinicians reported that CoDE-HF could be a useful adjunct to clinical assessment of patients with breathlessness in the emergency department. Ease of model output interpretation is key to acceptance with interviews identifying a need to refine presentation of score information.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferry, A. V., Lee, K. K., Doudesis, D., Tuck, C., Gray, A. J., Mills, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-24T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215220</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215220</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinician interaction with a machine learning algorithm for the assessment of patients with possible acute heart failure: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216075v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Absorbable sutures appear clinically effective and may be more cost-effective than non-absorbable sutures for definitive closure of adult facial lacerations]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216075v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A short cut review of the literature was carried out to examine the evidence supporting the use of absorbable suture for definitive closure of facial lacerations. Two papers were identified as suitable for inclusion using the reported search strategy. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of the best papers are tabulated. The current evidence suggests that use of absorbable sutures for definitive wound closure in facial lacerations delivers comparable cosmetic outcomes, with no difference in reported complications. Use of absorbable sutures may be more cost effective, through avoidance of further downstream healthcare resource use.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly, M., Horner, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216075</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216075</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Best evidence topic reports]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Absorbable sutures appear clinically effective and may be more cost-effective than non-absorbable sutures for definitive closure of adult facial lacerations]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Best Evidence Topic reports</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216070v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[My first surgical airway]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-216070v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I was working as the casualty medical officer in the triage area of the emergency department (ED), where I was doing my emergency medicine residency. The evening had been busy but manageable until a call came from the emergency operating theatre (OT). They had a patient they were unable to intubate or oxygenate. The senior consultant was already occupied with another critical case. There was no difficult airway response team waiting in the background. The responsibility, at that moment, fell to whoever was available. So, on my run from the ED to the OT, I found myself reciting the steps of cricothyroidotomy, which will be the maximum an emergency physician can do to secure an airway. &lsquo;Finger-Scalpel-Finger-Bougie-Tube&rsquo;.</p><p>When I reached the OT, I saw another senior resident of anaesthesia was trying to intubate him for the fourth time. The patient had trismus, which was not noted earlier. Oxygen saturation was falling.</p><p>In...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashwin Kumar, V. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-216070</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-216070</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[My first surgical airway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215369v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Experience and needs of emergency nurses in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215369v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>This study seeks to explore the experiences of emergency nurses in providing care to patients nearing the end of life and to identify the needs of emergency nurses in the palliative care (PC) process.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A qualitative meta-synthesis approach (following Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research guidelines) was implemented to systematically review relevant qualitative studies. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, encompassing PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang database and Scopus. The search duration was from database inception to March 2025.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In total, 22 studies complied with the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-synthesis. Three main themes were identified: (i) needs for emergency palliative care (EPC) and current practice in emergency departments (EDs); (ii) emotional, ethical and communication experiences of nurses in providing PC in EDs; (iii) nurses&rsquo; perceived needs for training, support and system coordination. Across studies, EPC in the ED was described as occurring alongside acute life-saving care. Nurses&rsquo; experiences and attitudes towards EPC varied significantly, ranging from positive engagement to perceived incompatibility with their roles in emergency care.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This meta-synthesis highlights the complexity of providing PC in EDs and the urgency of implementing systematic interventions. To enhance the effectiveness and quality of EPC, it is necessary to provide systematic support and targeted strategies, thereby helping emergency nurses better meet the needs of patients at the end of life.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD420251008755.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liu, N., Chen, L., Mao, X., Xia, S., Wang, Q., Hu, D., Zhou, R., Zhang, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Experience and needs of emergency nurses in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214835v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Epidemiology and outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without coma after return of spontaneous circulation: a multicentre cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214835v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In clinical practice, we encounter patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without coma after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, the epidemiology, characteristics and outcomes in this population remain unclear. The primary aim was to describe the epidemiology, characteristics and outcomes of patients with OHCA who did not experience coma after ROSC. The secondary aim was to identify factors associated with survival and good functional outcomes in this patient population.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This was a secondary analysis of the data from the Japan Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM)-OHCA Registry. Adult patients with OHCA without coma (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score &ge;8) after ROSC between June 2014 and December 2019 were included. The primary endpoint was 30-day survival with good functional outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category Score of 1&ndash;2). Multivariable logistic regression analysis with a generalised estimating equation was performed to examine the factors associated with 30-day survival with good functional outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the study period, 57 754 patients with OHCA were enrolled in the JAAM-OHCA Registry, of which 874 (1.5%) adult patients without coma after ROSC were analysed. Among them, the proportion of patients with 30-day survival with good functional outcomes was 76.0% (n=664), and the 30-day survival rate was 86.4% (n=755). Multivariable analysis revealed that younger age, witnessed cardiac arrest, shockable rhythms at the scene, GCS Motor Response (GCS-M) Score of 5 or 6 after ROSC, lower lactate levels and higher pH levels (pH&ge;7.10) were associated with 30-day survival with good functional outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Even among the patients with OHCA who achieved ROSC without coma, approximately a quarter of patients had poor functional outcomes. Older age, non-witnessed cardiac arrest, non-shockable rhythms at the scene, lower GCS-M Score after ROSC, higher lactate levels and lower pH levels predicted poorer outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taira, T., Inoue, A., Kuroda, Y., Nishimura, T., Suga, M., Yamafuji, Y., Nakatani, Y., Ijuin, S., Nakamura, K., Ishihara, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-16T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214835</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214835</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Epidemiology and outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without coma after return of spontaneous circulation: a multicentre cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215114v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From health literacy to emergency room: understanding the factors behind adult emergency visits]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215114v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>It is believed that low health literacy (HL) is associated with inappropriate use of emergency departments (ED). The volume of ED visits in Turkey continues to increase. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of adults&rsquo; HL level, reasons for attending the ED, frequency of visits and trust in health news on social media on HL level and ED visits.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a university hospital ED in Istanbul from December 2021 to January 2023. Participants were adults (&gt;18 years) admitted to the green or yellow triage areas, representing non-urgent or moderately urgent conditions. Data were collected through a Personal Information Form and the Turkish Health Literacy Scale-32 (THLS-32), administered either face to face or online.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 466 participants (mean age 30.3&plusmn;12.9 years, 71.7% female) were included. Most participants were university graduates. The mean THLS-32 score was 30.35&plusmn;10.11 (range 0&ndash;50), with only 13.9% (42&ndash;50 points) classified as having &lsquo;excellent&rsquo; HL. Participants who reported relying on social media for health news and those who visited the ED due to &lsquo;long waits for a hospital outpatient clinic&rsquo; had lower THLS-32 scores. There was no statistically significant association between HL and frequent ED attendance, age, gender or educational level.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Lower HL is associated with greater reliance on unverified information in social media for health news and ED attendance due to long outpatient waits. Our findings highlight the need for targeted HL and digital HL initiatives to reduce avoidable ED visits and strengthen healthcare navigation skills.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dogan, H. D., Baykara Mat, S. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215114</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215114</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From health literacy to emergency room: understanding the factors behind adult emergency visits]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215492v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association of acute neurological symptoms with mortality in patients with heat-related illness: a nationwide study in Japan]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215492v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background and objective</st><p>Heat-related illnesses can range from mild to severe, potentially causing death or disability. Central nervous system abnormalities are crucial clinical indicators, yet their relationships with outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to investigate this association using a Japanese nationwide database.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This study analysed data from the Heatstroke Study database (2017&ndash;2021) which included adult Japanese patients with heat-related illnesses. Acute neurological symptoms (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) &lt;14 and/or seizures) were the primary exposure. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality and unfavourable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) &ge;3). Adjusted ORs with 95% CIs were estimated using multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, preadmission mRS, Charlson Comorbidity Index, occurrence situation, body temperature and systolic blood pressure.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 2961 patients (median age 73.0 years, 69.4% were male), the in-hospital mortality was 5.4% (160/2961). The observed mortality was 10.9% (142/1303) in patients with acute neurological symptoms and 1.1% (18/1658) in patients without symptoms. Unfavourable functional outcomes occurred in 42.2% (455/1078) of patients with acute neurological symptoms and 10.4% (155/1492) of patients without symptoms. After adjustment, acute neurological symptoms were found to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 7.33, 95% CI 4.50 to 12.64) and unfavourable functional outcomes (adjusted OR 5.15, 95% CI 4.14 to 6.44). A dose-dependent relationship was observed between GCS severity and mortality, with GCS 3&ndash;8 showing the highest risk compared with GCS 14&ndash;15 (adjusted OR 12.23, 95% CI 7.42 to 21.17).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Acute neurological symptoms, particularly impaired consciousness, were independently associated with mortality and unfavourable outcomes in heat-related illnesses. These findings emphasise the importance of neurological symptoms in severity classification for heat-related illnesses.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Satoh, K., Okada, Y., Suzuki, Y., Kanda, J., Yokobori, S., Okuyama, M., Nakae, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215492</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215492</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association of acute neurological symptoms with mortality in patients with heat-related illness: a nationwide study in Japan]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215449v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnostic accuracy of the G-FAST score for detecting large vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215449v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Early and accurate detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) is essential for timely endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke. The Gaze-Face-Arm-Speech-Time (G-FAST) scale has been proposed as a potential prehospital screening tool for LVO than the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS). This study systematically evaluates the diagnostic performance of G-FAST and compares it with CPSS.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Embase and Scopus was performed up to 31 December 2024. Pooled sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were estimated. Network meta-analysis was used to compare diagnostic performance across G-FAST&ge;3, CPSS&ge;2 and CPSS&ge;3.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>13 studies involving 12 414 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis of G-FAST. G-FAST &ge;3 demonstrated pooled sensitivity and specificity of 73.3% (95% CI 66.2% to 79.4%) and 74.3% (95% CI 65.3% to 81.6%), respectively, with an AUC of 0.80. In the network meta-analysis (six studies, 7012 participants), CPSS &ge;2 showed the highest pooled sensitivity (79.0%, 95% CI 60.4% to 90.3%) and pooled specificity (66.1%, 95% CI 40.6% to 84.7%), whereas CPSS &ge;3 demonstrated higher specificity (83.8%, 95% CI 63.6% to 93.9%) but reduced sensitivity (63.4%, 95% CI 40.1% to 81.7%). G-FAST &ge;3 showed a more balanced performance between sensitivity (71.6%, 95% CI 51.4% to 85.7%) and specificity (76.4%, 95% CI 53.8% to 90.0%), with a numerically higher specificity than CPSS &ge;2. Overall, there were no statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance among the scales.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>G-FAST demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for prehospital LVO detection, with performance comparable to traditional scales. Its use provides a feasible alternative for pre-hospital stroke triage, though further large-scale validation is warranted.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD42023477601.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, J.-J., Lin, H.-A., Huang, H.-C., Lin, Y.-C., Lin, S.-F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:18-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215449</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215449</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnostic accuracy of the G-FAST score for detecting large vessel occlusion in suspected stroke patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215940v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency medicine as risk management: a cognitive scaffold for safe decisions under uncertainty]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215940v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Emergency medicine (EM) is often mischaracterised as symptom-based care, yet, in practice, it is the discipline of making time-critical decisions with incomplete information, under conditions where delay can cause irreversible harm. The emergency physician&rsquo;s central cognitive task is therefore less the pursuit of perfect diagnostic labels and more the management of risk: identifying immediate threats, stabilising physiology, excluding dangerous alternatives and formulating a safe disposition plan. This concepts paper introduces a simple cognitive scaffold&mdash;<I>Stabilise, Exclude, Decide (S-E-D)</I>&mdash;to make EM reasoning explicit, teachable and transferable across settings. We describe how S-E-D maps onto the realities of undifferentiated presentations, crowding and diagnostic uncertainty, and how neglecting this mindset contributes to predictable errors such as premature closure, anchoring and underestimation of disposition risk. We then outline practical strategies for teaching S-E-D at the bedside using structured questions, deliberate reassessment and probability-based interpretation of tests. By reframing EM as the cognitive craft of safe decision-making under uncertainty, this framework aims to clarify the specialty&rsquo;s contribution for clinicians and residents and to support safer practice and more purposeful education internationally.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jain, A., Bhoi, S., V T, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215940</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215940</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency medicine as risk management: a cognitive scaffold for safe decisions under uncertainty]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215074v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Telesimulation as a digital strategy for scaling trauma skills training for reach: a global partnership case study from India]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215074v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Injuries account for 8.5% of global deaths, with 83% occurring in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). India faces a significant trauma burden, with 153 972 road traffic fatalities in 2021, alongside a pronounced shortage of trained emergency care providers. Existing trauma training models, such as WHO-ICRC Basic Emergency Care and the Advanced Trauma Life Support course, while valuable, are resource-intensive. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of virtual education, presenting an opportunity to scale trauma training in LMICs.</p><p>This paper describes a novel, gamified trauma telesimulation activity designed to address these challenges. Using the each, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, we assessed its reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and potential for maintenance. The activity involved 20 emergency medicine residents across four hospitals in India who participated in a competitive, single-elimination trauma simulation via Zoom. Scenarios focused on managing paediatric head trauma and adult polytrauma. A further 159 residents from 13 remote sites observed and contributed to scoring and debrief discussions. The initiative reached 179 trainees across 17 hospitals in 12 cities, spanning distances of over 2000 km. Adoption was facilitated by familiarity with online platforms, English as a shared language and stable connectivity. The model demonstrated feasibility for scaling trauma skills training in resource-limited settings. Future work should include mixed-methods evaluation, tracking clinical outcomes and establishing frameworks for local faculty to sustain delivery. Integrating telesimulation into national programmes and trauma registries may support broader health system strengthening. This model offers a promising, low-cost strategy to help address critical gaps in trauma training and workforce capacity in LMICs.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gidwani, S., Owens, S., Mittal, V., Varghese, J., Jena, N. N., Ahluwalia, T., Douglass, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215074</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215074</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Telesimulation as a digital strategy for scaling trauma skills training for reach: a global partnership case study from India]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215530v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Unlocking clinical narratives: how natural language processing and artificial intelligence can address data deficits and mitigate health inequities in urgent and emergency care]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215530v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Urgent and Emergency Care system generates a wealth of clinical information, but our ability to harness this for public health planning and to address health inequalities is constrained by systemic data quality issues. Modern natural language processing (NLP), driven by the context-aware capabilities of transformer-based architectures and large language models, offers a transformative opportunity to bridge this gap. By training machines to interpret and structure context-rich clinical notes at scale, we can translate complex patient stories into data ready for research and systems intelligence that reflects the realities of real-world care.</p><p>This technology offers a potential route to addressing health inequities in vulnerable populations, such as those presenting with crises related to mental ill-health, alcohol and drug use. Current reliance on structured but oversimplistic data often fails to capture the complex intersectionalities of clinical and social contexts. This is due to factors like diagnostic overshadowing and unrecorded multimorbidity, leaving these patients statistically obscured within routine datasets, which fail to accurately represent volume or complexity. This data invisibility perpetuates a cycle of inaccurate disease burden estimates, under-resourced services and flawed policy. By unlocking the detailed narrative data within unstructured notes, NLP could allow us to identify the acute social stressors and psychiatric contexts that are currently invisible, making these inequities visible and actionable.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Humphries, C., Scho&#x0308;lin, L., Brennan, G., Brett, J., Eddleston, M., Lloyd, A., Miell, A., Reed, M. J., Casey, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215530</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215530</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Unlocking clinical narratives: how natural language processing and artificial intelligence can address data deficits and mitigate health inequities in urgent and emergency care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215574v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency medicine in Ethiopia: key updated statistics and insights]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215574v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I graduated from medical school in Addis Ababa in 2024 into an emergency medicine system that barely existed a decade ago. Working in Ethiopia&rsquo;s emergency departments has underscored that building emergency care infrastructure in a resource-limited country requires creativity, governmental commitment and acceptance that progress will be uneven and incomplete for years. One illustration of this reality occurred during periods when commercial inhaler spacers were unavailable, when clinicians locally fabricated simple spacer devices using clean plastic bottles to facilitate bronchodilator administration for patients in acute respiratory distress. Used as a temporary mitigation rather than a substitute for standard equipment, this approach illustrates how frontline teams adapt care processes when essential resources are lacking.</p><p>Ethiopia&rsquo;s emergency medicine expansion was driven by necessity. Ethiopia faces one of the world&rsquo;s highest injury mortality rates at 94 per 100 000 population, substantially higher than the sub-Saharan African average of 30&ndash;40 per 100 000 and more than 10 times...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teferi, M. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-08T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215574</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215574</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency medicine in Ethiopia: key updated statistics and insights]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215982v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Some nights stay with you]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215982v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tonight in the emergency department, I met a child after a road traffic accident. His CT scan showed a depressed frontal bone skull fracture&mdash;surgically correctable, but not forgiving.</p><p>He was awake. Talking. Fully conscious.</p><p>There was dried blood matted into the hair. The small body looked swallowed by the trauma bed, feet not quite reaching the edge of the mattress. The slippers sat neatly tucked underneath, as if this were a routine visit instead of a trauma bay. The child answered every question appropriately, scanning the room with wide, watchful eyes.</p><p>Then came the whisper: "When can I go home?"</p><p>For a moment, it was easy to forget how close this was to something catastrophic.</p><p>Clinically, the decision was straightforward. Humanly, it was not.</p><p>The child needed urgent surgery. The fracture was open, and the risks of swelling, infection and sudden deterioration were real. Delay carried consequences we could not predict or control. I began carefully,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jain, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215982</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215982</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Some nights stay with you]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215272v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Impact of bystander and patient sex on cardiopulmonary resuscitation provision in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215272v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Female patients who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) than male patients. However, the interaction between the patient and the sex of the bystander in CPR provision remains underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the interaction between patient and sex of bystander in CPR provision during OHCA and to assess CPR rates based on dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) administration status.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This cohort study used prospectively collected nationwide registry data between January 2019 and June 2023. Adult patients with medical aetiology of OHCA who were transported by emergency medical services were included. The primary outcome was bystander CPR provision according to sex. The secondary outcome was the provision of bystander CPR based on DA-CPR administration status.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 6487 patients with OHCA were included (median (IQR) age: 55 (52&ndash;64) years; male bystanders treated 3977 patients (61.3%)). The bystander CPR rate was lower when the patient and sex of bystander differed (male patient&ndash;male bystander, 85.0% vs male patient&ndash;female bystander, 79.2%; female patient&ndash;male bystander, 79.5% vs female patient&ndash;female bystander, 82.1%). Female bystanders were less likely to provide bystander CPR than male bystanders (adjusted OR (aOR): 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95). The odds of a female bystander providing CPR to a male patient were significantly lower than those of a male bystander (aOR: 0.684, 95% CI 0.578 to 0.810). This difference was reduced when DA-CPR was administered (without DA-CPR, aOR: 0.673, 95% CI 0.475 to 0.952 vs with DA-CPR, aOR: 0.822, 95% CI 0.706 to 0.957).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>An interaction between the patient and the sex of bystander was observed, particularly when the patient was a male and the bystander was a female. DA-CPR may serve as a potential intervention to help mitigate this disparity.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Na, S., Yoo, K. H., Oh, J., Cho, Y., Lee, J., Lim, T. H., Kang, H., Ko, B. S., Kim, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-31T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215272</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215272</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Impact of bystander and patient sex on cardiopulmonary resuscitation provision in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-31</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215602v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effects of age, sex and body anthropometry on needle thoracostomy in a Singapore paediatric cohort: a chest CT study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215602v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Tension pneumothorax in children, although infrequently encountered, requires management with a high level of confidence and skill from the attending physician. Despite this, recommendations on location and needle length for needle thoracostomy (NT) in paediatric patients are not well-established. We therefore aimed to (1) identify how age, sex and body anthropometry affect chest wall thickness (CWT) at common NT landmarks and (2) determine the adequacy of needle lengths used.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective review was undertaken of chest CT scans performed on children aged 0&ndash;17 years at KK Women&rsquo;s and Children&rsquo;s Hospital in Singapore. Patients were categorised as infants (&lt;1 year old), children (1&ndash;9 years old) and adolescents (10&ndash;17 years old). Bilateral CWT at the second intercostal space (ICS) mid-clavicular line (MCL) and fourth ICS mid-axillary line (MAL) were measured radiographically. Adequacy of needle length is defined as CWT &lt; needle length in &gt;95% of cases.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>588 CT scans (192 infants, 224 children, 172 adolescents) were reviewed. Mean CWT at the second ICS MCL was 12.61 mm (SD&plusmn;4.14 mm), 15.62 mm (SD&plusmn;4.88 mm) and 26.64 mm (SD&plusmn;11.48 mm) for infants, children and adolescents, respectively. Mean CWT at the fourth ICS MAL is 14.95 mm (SD&plusmn;5.25 mm), 16.49 mm (SD&plusmn;5.89 mm) and 28.20 mm (SD&plusmn;11.53 mm) for infants, children and adolescents, respectively. Adequate needle length was 25 mm, 32 mm and 50 mm for infants, children and adolescents, respectively, when inserted at the second ICS MCL.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In a Singaporean population, mean CWT at the second ICS MCL is thinner than mean CWT at the fourth ICS MAL for all age, sex, weight-for-length and body mass index categories. For successful NT at the second ICS MCL, a 25 mm needle is recommended for infants, 32 mm for children and 50 mm for adolescents.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ang, A., Yao, S. H. W., Chen, Z. J., Pek, J. H., Tang, P. H., Fong, E. S. S., Tan, J. Y., Aurangzeb, A., Ong, G. Y.-K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-23T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215602</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215602</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effects of age, sex and body anthropometry on needle thoracostomy in a Singapore paediatric cohort: a chest CT study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215283v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spatial clustering of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in northern France and its association with social deprivation: a population-based registry study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215283v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) shows marked geographic variability. Socio-economic deprivation may contribute to this variability, but evidence from mixed urban&ndash;rural regions remains limited. We aimed to identify spatial clusters of OHCA incidence in northern France and to assess whether these clusters were associated with deprivation, care processes and outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from the French National Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry for all OHCAs managed by mobile intensive care units between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2016 in Nord-Pas-de-Calais. Age-adjusted and sex-adjusted standardised incidence ratios were smoothed with a Besag-York-Molli&eacute; Bayesian model. Spatial scan statistics identified incidence clusters. Cluster-level socioeconomic indicators, care processes and outcomes were compared</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Incidence was mapped across 1541 municipalities. Among 2867 OHCAs, mean annual OHCA incidence was 68.8 per 100000 inhabitants (range &lt;0.5 to &gt;1.5 across municipalities). Two high-incidence clusters (relative risk between 1.61 and 1.68) and three low-incidence clusters (relative risk between 0.48 and 0.66) were detected. High-incidence clusters displayed greater deprivation and lower median income. Bystander basic life support was less frequent (26.7%) and 12-month survival lowest (1.4%) in the most deprived cluster.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Pronounced spatial inequality in OHCA burden exists within northern France. Municipalities with higher deprivation experience disproportionately higher incidence and poorer long-term survival. Targeted cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and strategic automated external defibrillator deployment should prioritise these vulnerable communities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Azzouz, R., Genin, M., Vilhelm, C., Chazard, E., Beuscart, J.-B., Tazarourte, K., Wiel, E., Hubert, H., Baert, V., on behalf of the GR-ReAC, Abdelli, Agbemebia, Andregnette, Antonic-Ravaut, Campagne, Canon, Caresmel, Chopinaud, Couteux, Dabri, Delage, Delemar, Deuez, Doukhan, Druet, Dubeaux, Dubois, Ducasse, abdi, Ellena, Foly, Fosseux, Fresse, Gaoui, Grandjon, Hennache, Kahn, Klein, Langeron, Larchanche, Lefebvre, Lomberty, Loubert, Malaquin, Marrakchi, Masse, Menay, Messieux, Molet, Moquay, Pauchet, Pierre, Poher, Royer, Sawadogo, Segard, Singier, Sobocinski, Stefanski-Serniclay, Thiriez, Vanderstraeten, Vendois, Vermersch]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215283</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215283</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spatial clustering of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in northern France and its association with social deprivation: a population-based registry study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215388v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block versus intravenous morphine for pain management in older adults with hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215388v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Hip fracture pain is severe and is commonly managed with intravenous opioids that cause adverse effects in older adults. Although the use of regional anaesthesia is increasing, high-quality evidence remains limited, with insufficient randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block in the emergency department (ED). This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided PENG block with intravenous morphine for acute hip fracture pain in older adults presenting to the ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This open label, 1:1 parallel RCT using software-generated randomisation compared PENG block versus intravenous morphine (0.1 mg/kg) in patients aged &ge;65 years who presented to the ED with femoral head, intertrochanteric, subtrochanteric and neck fractures with acute moderate-to-severe pain, defined as &ge;5 on an 11-point Verbal Numeric Rating Scale (VNRS). <I>The primary outcome was improvement in the VNRS score at 30 min. The secondary outcomes included the need for rescue therapy (intravenous fentanyl 0.5 &micro;g/kg) and the incidence of adverse events.</I></p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 34 patients were included in the final analysis, with 17 patients in each group. At 30 min, the median reduction in pain score was greater in the PENG block group than in the intravenous morphine group (&ndash;6 (IQR&ndash;6 to &ndash;5) vs &ndash;3 (IQR &ndash;5 to &ndash;2); p=0.001). Generalised estimating equation analysis accounting for repeated measures demonstrated that the PENG block was associated with a significantly more pronounced reduction in pain over time than intravenous morphine (adjusted &beta; = &ndash;1.55; 95% CI &ndash;2.63 to &ndash;0.47; p=0.005). Rescue analgesia was required in 5.9% of patients receiving intravenous morphine, whereas no patients in the PENG block group required rescue therapy.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>PENG block is a highly effective and safe alternative to intravenous morphine for managing acute hip fracture pain, particularly in older adults.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sri-on, J., Fusakul, Y., Phisaiphun, K., Piyachan, P., Luksameearunothai, K., Kanokkanjana, P., Cappelleri, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-19T00:55:56-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215388</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215388</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block versus intravenous morphine for pain management in older adults with hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in the emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215655v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective patient-reported reasons for delayed diagnosis of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215655v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Prompt diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is crucial to prevent life-threatening complications. However, timely SAH diagnosis is not uniformly achieved. This work aims to identify and analyse patient-reported reasons contributing to delayed SAH diagnosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We prospectively interviewed all patients with delayed SAH diagnosis at Wessex Neurological Centre, UK, between 1 May 2018 and 30 April 2021. Interviews were structured detailing symptom onset, healthcare consultations and reasons for delays. Content analysis was used to develop a coding scheme, and statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance, 2 and Fisher&rsquo;s exact tests.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 550 cases of spontaneous SAH, 106 (19.3%) diagnoses were delayed.</p><p>85/106 (80.2%) patients did not seek immediate medical attention (15.5% of all SAH). The most common reasons were &lsquo;waiting to see if symptoms would settle&rsquo; (18/85, 3.3% of all SAH) and &lsquo;headaches not severe enough&rsquo; (15/85, 2.7% of all SAH).</p><p>48/106 (45.3%) reported diagnostic delays after seeking care (8.7% of all SAH), attributable to either misdiagnosis (36/48, 6.5% of all SAH) or errors in diagnostic testing (12/48, 2.2% of all SAH).</p><p>Patients who did not seek immediate medical attention were more likely to experience diagnostic delays after seeking care (OR 9.77, 95% CI 4.97 to 19.49, p&lt;0.001). Among patients presenting late, diagnostic delays after seeking care occurred more frequently in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15 patients compared with GCS &lt;15 (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 19.5, p=0.011). 49/85 (57.6%) patients who delayed seeking care, and 21/36 (58.3%) misdiagnosed patients reported clinical thunderclap headache.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Prospective patient interviews capture data missed by retrospective chart review. This work has therefore identified important sources of delay in seeking care following the onset of SAH. Patients with delayed presentation were more likely to experience healthcare errors. These insights may help inform clinician awareness and public health initiatives aimed at earlier diagnosis.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hall, S., Suresh, V. A., Bandyopadhyay, S., Sutton, R., Ewbank, F., Bulters, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T12:52:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215655</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215655</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective patient-reported reasons for delayed diagnosis of spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215690v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prehospital management of acute behavioural disturbance: managing severe agitation in the prehospital setting - a systematic literature review]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215690v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>Acute behavioural disturbance (ABD), formally known as excited delirium, is an under-recognised clinical picture often characterised by abnormal physiology and extreme agitation. The condition is potentially dangerous for both patients and practitioners, particularly in the prehospital setting. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence for management of ABD within the prehospital environment.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A systematic literature search (PROSPERO CRD42023447238) of PubMed, Cochrane trials, Cochrane reviews, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar and MEDLINE was performed from inception until February 2025. Any study that examined the management of ABD prehospitally was included. Randomised controlled trials, observational cohort studies and case series that were written in English were included. Methodological quality of included studies was interpreted using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 6091 studies, 42 were included; none were high quality and 6 were moderate quality. Ketamine demonstrated the most effective sedation (range 79&ndash;98% of all patients included achieving adequate sedation as defined in the studies), although doses and methods of administration varied significantly. Midazolam generally showed a higher number of side effects than other drugs studied. Droperidol was not found to have a higher mortality than others, and no effect was seen on the QT interval.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Ketamine was found to be the most studied drug for treatment of ABD in the prehospital setting and is likely the most effective method of sedation at a dose of 5 mg/kg intramuscularly. Midazolam appears to have a higher risk of side effects, particularly respiratory-related, in comparison to other sedative agents. Conclusions are limited by the quality of evidence currently available and additional research is required to establish the most effective mode of administration and dose for this population group, as well as better definition of the presenting condition and outcome measures.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD42023447238.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, F., Todd, J., Avery, P., Morton, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T12:52:54-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215690</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215690</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prehospital management of acute behavioural disturbance: managing severe agitation in the prehospital setting - a systematic literature review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215651v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Fall risk prediction in older adults at the emergency department: where the guidelines do not fit]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215651v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Falls represent 10% of emergency department (ED) visits in older patients. Identification of those at risk for future falls is important to allow for preventive interventions. The aim of the study was to investigate the accuracy of a new algorithm, based on an adaptation of the World Falls Guidelines (WFG) for falls prevention and management, to identify patients at high risk of recurrent falls in a cohort of older patients with fall-related visits to the ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>The FALL-ER registry is a prospective, observational, multipurpose cohort including consecutive, community-dwelling patients age &ge;65 years, attending the ED of five Spanish hospitals after a fall during 52 randomly selected days between 2014 and 2015. Variables necessary to operationalise the algorithm or a proxy when necessary were recorded. The primary outcome was a new fall within 6 months after the index visit. Survival and logistic regression analyses were conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The cohort included 1241 patients (median age 80 years (IQR 73&ndash;85), 69.1% female). The algorithm allowed the classification of 1039 patients (88.7%) as high risk, 39 (3.3%) as intermediate risk and 93 (7.9%) as low risk of future falls. Overall, there were 134 patients (11.4%) who met the outcome and experienced a new fall within 6 months after the index ED visit. The cumulative probability of suffering a new fall was 13% (95% CI 10.8% to 15.1%), 17% (95% CI 4.8% to 29.1%) and 8.5% (95% CI 2.4% to 14.6%) in the high-risk, intermediate-risk and low-risk groups, respectively, without significant differences between groups (log-rank=0.422). Being classified as high risk had a sensitivity of 90% (95% CI 85% to 95%) and a specificity of 11% (95% CI 10% to 13%) for new falls.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A new fall-risk screening tool, based on the WFG algorithm, had poor discriminatory capacity in our ED cohort to predict new falls within 6 months of the index fall.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garcia-Martinez, A., Artajona, L., Garcia-Rosa, S., Torres Machado, V., Gil-Rodrigo, A., Perez-Fonseca, C., Aguilo, S., Lee, J. S., Jacob, J., Llorens, P., Herrero-Puente, P., Gomez-Angelats, E., Boixeda, C., Martin-Sanchez, F. J., Lazaro del Nogal, M., Miro, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-18T12:52:53-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215651</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215651</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Fall risk prediction in older adults at the emergency department: where the guidelines do not fit]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215510v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Qualitative study of reflective practice groups for emergency medicine resident doctors]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215510v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Aim</st><p>Resident doctors in their 3rd year of emergency medicine training in the UK face multiple challenges, leading to very high levels of burnout and exodus from the training programme. The North West School of Emergency Medicine trialled reflective practice (Balint) groups to try and help this. This involves regular small group meetings focusing on case-based reflections on the emotional aspects of practice. We aimed to explore the impact of Balint groups on emergency medicine resident doctors.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with resident doctors in their 3rd year of training (ST3) in the UK. Participants included those who had undertaken Balint group sessions, ST3s who did not participate, and Balint group facilitators. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>12 participants were included between September 2023 and May 2024. They reported Balint groups to be a hugely positive part of their training. Participants developed a psychological toolkit and a supportive community to help manage the emotional and stress-related aspects of emergency medicine. This led to improved job satisfaction, which participants believed would enhance retention. Participants felt their ability to manage the emotional needs and challenges of their patients had improved. The groups were feasible to run but required planning and communication to facilitate release from clinical work.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Balint groups for ST3 emergency medicine resident doctors are feasible. Clinicians report benefits for themselves and perceived benefits for their patients. This supports continuing and developing the programme locally and piloting similar programmes in other professional groups and localities.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darbyshire, D., Haynes, G., Conway, R., Kennedy, H., Baker, J., Johnston, A., Parris, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-11T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215510</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215510</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Qualitative study of reflective practice groups for emergency medicine resident doctors]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215894v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Refocusing peer review on science rather than formatting requirements]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2026-215894v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Peer review plays a central role in ensuring the quality, rigour and relevance of medical research. For clinicians and researchers alike, it represents a critical checkpoint before evidence is incorporated into practice or policy. Yet, across many journals, authors continue to encounter extensive presubmission formatting requirements that contribute little to scientific evaluation while consuming substantial time. As medical research becomes increasingly collaborative and interdisciplinary, the persistence of highly journal-specific stylistic rules appears increasingly misaligned with the needs of the clinical and academic community.</p><p>A major source of inefficiency arises from expectations that manuscripts conform to a journal&rsquo;s unique formatting conventions before they are even considered for peer review. These requirements may dictate article categories, section headings, reporting language and placement, figure and table formats, reference styles, or the inclusion of graphical abstracts and summary boxes. When strict compliance is required prior to editorial assessment, authors must invest considerable effort in preparation...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gottlieb, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2026-215894</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2026-215894</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Refocusing peer review on science rather than formatting requirements]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>In perspective</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215613v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[From triage to transformation: tackling inequalities in emergency care through a public health lens]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215613v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Emergency departments (EDs) and NHS ambulance services often serve as the first and only point of contact with healthcare for individuals from deprived communities, marginalised populations and other groups that face inequalities in both access to, and quality of healthcare. These include ethnic minorities, people experiencing homelessness, asylum seekers, sex workers, individuals transitioning from criminal justice settings as well as older adults, children and pregnant women. These populations face disproportionate burdens of disease and systemic barriers to care. Integration of Public Health into Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) services presents an opportunity to address these challenges.</p><p>These issues cannot be solved by UEC services alone. EDs and ambulance services, however, are uniquely positioned to identify and address health inequalities by building close relationships with local authorities, primary care, social care and voluntary, community and social enterprises to support preventive efforts, help people before they need to come to ED, reduce repeat attendances and improve patients&rsquo; experiences and outcomes.</p><p>Health inequalities cost the NHS billions of pounds each year. Embedding public health in EDs is not just a clinical improvement&mdash;it is an economically sound, ethically responsible, equity intervention that addresses the social determinants of health and ensures the most vulnerable receive timely, tailored support.</p><p>EDs and NHS ambulance services are more than services for time of crisis&mdash;they are places of opportunity. By embedding public health principles into emergency care, we can transform emergency care into engines of equity, resilience and prevention. Investing in public health within these settings is not only the right thing to do for patient outcomes and health equity&mdash;it is ultimately cost-effective, reducing demand on UEC and improving population health in the long term.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tang, S., Greengross, P., Nijman, R., Mapstone, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-27T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215613</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215613</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[From triage to transformation: tackling inequalities in emergency care through a public health lens]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Concepts</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215703v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exploring public information needs on resuscitation: an artificial intelligence-assisted content analysis of questions posted online]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215703v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Effective planning of interventions intended to engage the community in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> requires identifying and measuring corresponding public information needs on a large scale, particularly through a content analysis of social media. Accordingly, this exploratory study primarily aimed to characterise the landscape of community internet discourse on CPR based on the data from the question-and-answer website Quora (Quora, USA)&mdash;one of the most popular social media platforms with over 400 million monthly active users.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p><p>Assuming that the content analysis would include hundreds of questions, a decision was made to apply the cutting-edge generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) model GPT-5 embedded in Microsoft Copilot (Microsoft Corporation, USA) chatbot. The chatbot prompt was created using human-in-the-loop prompt engineering () and anchored to conventional content analysis principles.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p><p>All questions (n=893, dated 03 January 2012 to 18 August 2025) were collected manually from four resuscitation-related Quora topics (&lsquo;Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation&rsquo;, &lsquo;Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Birkun, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T20:03:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215703</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215703</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exploring public information needs on resuscitation: an artificial intelligence-assisted content analysis of questions posted online]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215888v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Panic at 34 000 feet]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215888v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>"She said lorazepam twice a day and something about diplo- or diclofenac," said a flight attendant quietly a few rows behind me. I was half asleep in seat 35F of the commercial twinjet, on the way home to Georgia on a chilly December evening. Minutes later, the overhead rang. "If there are any doctors or nurses on board, please press the call button."</p><p>On a flight out of Boston, the odds were in the patient&rsquo;s favour, I thought. Surely, a healthcare provider from one of the 25 metro-area hospitals would respond. I didn&rsquo;t press the button. I felt suspended between roles: trained enough to recognise an emergency, but uncertain whether I possessed the earned authority to act. As the flight attendant walked past again, a pace brisker than usual, I stopped her. "Excuse me," I said. "I&rsquo;m a medical student, not licensed or anything, but uh, if you need help..."</p><p>She nodded....]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Athni, T. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T20:03:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215888</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215888</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Panic at 34 000 feet]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215527v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Modifiers of the effectiveness of point-of-care troponin testing and determinants of concordance between diagnostic pathway recommendations and disposition in patients with chest pain: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215527v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>While point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing has the potential to reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), evidence of real world effectiveness is lacking. Our objective was to examine factors that influence the real world effectiveness of POC hs-cTn-based accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) in reducing ED LOS.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This is a post hoc analysis from the "Aiming towards evidence-based interpretation of cardiac biomarkers in patients presenting with chest pain using POC testing" (WESTCOR-POC) study which included 1494 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome presenting to the ED at a moderately sized hospital in Norway. Patients were randomised to receive hs-cTn measurements at admission and after 1 hour either by POC or central laboratory testing. This post hoc analysis examines factors affecting the effectiveness of a POC-based ADP and predictors of non-ADP-concordant disposition. Both outcomes were assessed using regression models, with significance level set at p&lt;0.05.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Overall, 36.1% of patients met the ADPs&rsquo; early discharge criteria, of which 66% were discharged. In effect-modification analyses, the effect of POC testing on ED LOS differed by concordance with ADP recommendations (interaction p=0.011), with a reduction among patients with ADP-concordant disposition (&ndash;14 min 95% CI &ndash;26 to &ndash;3), but no corresponding reduction among patients with discordant disposition (13.5 min, 95% CI &ndash;4.5 to 31.4). Factors predicting hospital admission despite ADP-recommended discharge were: age &gt;60 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.7, p=0.001), high triage category (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0, p=0.003) and suspected serious differential diagnosis (OR 5.9, 95% 3.5 to 9.9, p&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Our findings highlight the need for implementation strategies that support ADP concordant disposition decisions and ensure appropriate patient selection to realise the efficiency potential of POC hs-cTn testing in the ED.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thulin, V. I., Myrmel, G. M. S., Jordalen, S. M. F., Lekven, O. C., Krishnapillai, J., Steiro, O.-T., Body, R., Collinson, P. O., Apple, F., Cullen, L., Norekval, T. M., Wisloff, T., Vikenes, K., Bjorneklett, R. O., Omland, T., Aakre, K. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T20:03:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215527</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215527</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Modifiers of the effectiveness of point-of-care troponin testing and determinants of concordance between diagnostic pathway recommendations and disposition in patients with chest pain: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215682v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Beyond the bullet: hidden financial wounds after firearm injury and paths towards equitable access to compensation]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215682v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Advances in trauma care have improved survival after firearm injury; however, survivors often experience substantial financial hardship, which has been linked to worse physical and mental health outcomes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> US insurance claims data demonstrate that firearm injury survivors incur more than US$25 000 in healthcare spending in the first month after injury, with patient cost-sharing increasing nearly 19-fold.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Government-based victim compensation programmes provide financial support to violent crime victims and have existed in the USA since the 1980s, with comparable programmes internationally in the UK, European Union, Canada and Australia.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> These programmes typically cover medical bills, mental health services, lost wages, funeral and burial costs and emergency relocation. Emergency clinicians are often the first point of healthcare contact after violent injury and play a critical role in connecting patients to social work services and hospital violence intervention programmes (HVIPs), which support survivors...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reyes, A., Mckenzie, C., Valenzuela, J. Y., Miami-Dade County Anti-Violence Initiatives Study Group, Rawlins, Toribio, Thompkins, Nelson, Yates, Noel, Gorkin-Rapley, Francis, Lott, Maycock, Davis]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215682</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215682</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Beyond the bullet: hidden financial wounds after firearm injury and paths towards equitable access to compensation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215688v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Emergency front of neck access in the setting of paediatric trauma]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215688v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>&lsquo;Can&rsquo;t intubate, can&rsquo;t oxygenate&rsquo; (CICO) is a medical emergency in the paediatric trauma patient requiring emergency front of neck access (eFONA) interventions including needle/cannula cricothyroidotomy, surgical cricothyroidotomy or tracheostomy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> A difficult paediatric airway is a rare event, reported in just 0.28% of cases.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Of these, 2% require an eFONA procedure.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> However, there are variations between guidelines on how to manage CICO in paediatric trauma patients (<cross-ref type="tbl" refid="T1">table 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>We aimed to establish patterns and outcomes of eFONA procedures performed in paediatric trauma patients by interrogating two established trauma registries: the UK and Ireland Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN, interrogated January 2000 to December 2022),<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> and the Australian Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR, inception (2001) to December 2022).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> TARN includes all trauma patients who meet specific length of stay and injury severity criteria. VSTR includes all trauma...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McDonald, R., Coffey, M., Lecky, F., Mclellan, S., Cameron, P., Mullen, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-23T09:00:36-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215688</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215688</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Emergency front of neck access in the setting of paediatric trauma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215660v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rising paediatric emergency department use despite demographic decline: a 23-year analysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215660v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Over the past two decades, paediatric emergency departments (PEDs) worldwide have experienced an increase in attendance, despite declining birth rates and enhanced access to primary care. This paradox suggests that the rising demand may be attributed to non-urgent conditions rather than genuine paediatric emergencies. Understanding the impact of demographic decline on PED utilisation is essential for effective health-service planning. This study assessed long-term trends in PED utilisation and hospitalisations in relation to declining birth rates in Liguria, Italy.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective time-series analysis of PED visits and hospitalisations at Istituto di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Giannina Gaslini Children&rsquo;s Hospital from 2002 to 2024 was conducted. Data on annual live births and residents aged &le;14 years were obtained from regional datasets. The incidence rates of PED visits and hospitalisations were calculated relative to births and the paediatric population. Trends were analysed using correlation coefficients, with sensitivity analyses excluding the COVID-19 years (2020&ndash;2021).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Over 23 years, 840 221 PED visits and 85 186 hospitalisations were recorded. Hospitalisations per 1000 PED visits decreased significantly (p&lt;0.001). PED visits per 1000 live births increased significantly, both regionally (p&lt;0.001) and provincially (p&lt;0.001). Hospitalisations per 1000 paediatric residents aged &le;14 years declined significantly (p&lt;0.001). After excluding the COVID-19 years, per-capita PED utilisation increased significantly, confirming a rising demand for emergency care despite demographic decline.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Despite reduced birth rates and a declining paediatric population, PED visits have increased disproportionately, driven by non-urgent cases. This discrepancy highlights systemic inefficiencies and behavioural determinants of inappropriate PED use, contributing to crowding. Comprehensive strategies, including enhanced primary care access, parental education, care integration and innovative organisational models, are necessary to ensure sustainable paediatric emergency care delivery.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bellini, T., Mariani, M., Brisca, G., Tubino, B., Spiazzi, R., Spiga, G., Piccotti, E., Moscatelli, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-13T21:05:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215660</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215660</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rising paediatric emergency department use despite demographic decline: a 23-year analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215373v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Balancing act of academic clinical fellows in UK emergency medicine: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215373v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Emergency medicine (EM) faces significant workforce challenges in sustaining clinical academic careers. Academic clinical fellowships (ACFs) offer protected research time, but little is known about how EM ACFs experience and navigate these posts.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 current and former EM ACFs from 12 universities in England and Wales. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke&rsquo;s six-phase approach. A mixed inductive and deductive framework was applied. Reflexivity and positionality were addressed through multi-researcher coding and consensus development.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Six themes were identified: (1) Elements of surprise&mdash;structural ambiguity and unexpected barriers; (2) Unclear direction&mdash;limited guidance and inconsistent supervision; (3) Loneliness&mdash;professional isolation and detachment from clinical peers; (4) Engagement&mdash;enthusiasm linked to research alignment and supervisory support; (5) Repeated generic hurdles&mdash;difficulty balancing academic and clinical demands; (6) EM-specific hurdles&mdash;reduced exposure to key rotations and limited academic mentorship within EM. Fellows reported uncertainty about extensions to training and programme variability.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The EM ACF provides valuable entry into clinical academia; however, inconsistent structures, supervisory support and clarity in expectations hinder its full potential. Standardised induction, tailored supervision and flexible but transparent pathways are needed. These findings can inform policy, training programmes and institutional practices to better support the next generation of clinical academics in EM in the UK.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barrett, L., Shanahan, T. A. G., Fish, R., Newcombe, V., Body, R., Jafar, A. J. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-13T21:05:12-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215373</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215373</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Balancing act of academic clinical fellows in UK emergency medicine: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214983v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Medical patient boarding in the emergency department as a source of crowding and delay-related harm, impacting patient outcomes and the efficiency of urgent and emergency care]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214983v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Previous studies have indicated that crowding within the emergency department (ED) is associated with longer lengths of stay in the ED and higher mortality. Boarding, the time patients spend waiting for an inpatient bed after ED assessment, represents a clinically unproductive delay and occupies scarce ED resources. We explore the association of medical patient boarding not only with their outcomes but also indirectly for other patients in the ED and those in and awaiting ambulances.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective cohort study using routine data for 3 EDs in England from July 2023 to May 2025 was performed. Direct, delay-related harm outcomes of medical patient boarding time were investigated: inpatient length of stay and 30-day re-admission and mortality rates. Indirect, crowding-mediated outcomes of medical patient boarding levels consisted of time in ED for non-admitted patients, ambulance handover times and Category 1, Category 2 and Category 3 ambulance response times. Mixed-effects regression analysis modelled each relationship while controlling for potential confounding.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The study examined 49 034 medical admissions, 210 334 non-admitted ED patients, 88 633 ambulance handovers and 146 278 ambulance responses. Medical patients, accounting for two-thirds of ED admissions, constituted 81% of total ED boarding time. Regression analysis showed that for a typical 25-bed ED, each additional five medical boarders was associated with an extra 7.9 min and 51.9 min ambulance response times for Category 2 and Category 3 calls and an extra 9.9 min of extra ambulance handover time. For admitted medical patients, each additional 4 hours of boarding time was associated with an extra 8.6 hours of inpatient length of stay and an 8.4% increase in the odds of 30-day mortality.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion&nbsp;</st><p>Boarding medical patients in the ED is associated with a significant increase in their risk of harm, including higher mortality and longer hospital stays. It also adversely affects other patients by delaying ambulances and reducing overall bed availability through extended inpatient stays.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howlett, N., Cameron, J., Wood, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-11T16:05:10-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-214983</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-214983</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Medical patient boarding in the emergency department as a source of crowding and delay-related harm, impacting patient outcomes and the efficiency of urgent and emergency care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215436v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Staff perspectives on implementing opt-out blood-borne virus testing in English emergency departments: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215436v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>A significant challenge to achieving global 2030 elimination goals for blood-borne viruses (BBVs) is identifying undiagnosed individuals and relinking those who are no longer in care. To address this, the UK government has implemented opt-out BBV testing in emergency departments (EDs) to increase access to BBV testing in high prevalence areas. All adult ED patients having a routine blood test are automatically tested for HIV, hepatitis B and C, unless they opt out. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of ED opt-out BBV testing and provide recommendations for future rollouts.</p></sec><sec><st>Method</st><p>Semi-structured interviews with 23 staff members across five ED sites in very high HIV prevalence areas were analysed thematically, informed by Normalisation Process Theory.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>While there was some variation in staff knowledge and understanding of the programme, overall acceptance of the opt-out testing approach was found to be high. Training had a positive impact on staff understanding of the purpose of the intervention and the correct process, including the opt-out model. High workloads and competing priorities in EDs were significant barriers to testing. However, some specific systems and processes that facilitated the uptake of testing included automation and BBV champions. Giving the programme time to embed into practice and ensuring feedback loops and flexibility to &lsquo;tweak&rsquo; the process was also essential to sustaining the programme.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>To embed opt-out testing into emergency care, sites should implement automated test ordering, staff training, clear communication and dedicated champions, which can help to support earlier diagnosis, reduce inequalities and improve patient outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Allison, S., May, T., Roberts, J., Hill-Tout, R., Hindle, S., Hickman, M., Yardley, L., Todd, R., Heath, R., Horwood, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-03T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215436</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215436</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Staff perspectives on implementing opt-out blood-borne virus testing in English emergency departments: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215578v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Footprint of social prescribing in emergency medicine in the UK]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215578v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Social prescribing (SP) connects patients to community organisations, activities and resources with the aim of improving their health and well-being. Social Prescribing Link Workers (SPLWs) use &lsquo;what matters to you?&rsquo; conversations to co-produce personalised care plans with patients.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> While this model has been embedded in primary care settings in the UK, the role of SPLWs in emergency departments (EDs) is early in development. A pilot study<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> and conceptual research<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> has identified that SP in ED has potential to reach patients requiring support with a range of health, social and well-being needs, particularly those impacted by health inequalities. Yet, the current availability of SP in UK EDs is unknown. The aim of this work is to explore the current SP capacity in UK EDs.</p><p>Freedom of Information requests were sent in early 2025 to National Health Service Trusts and Health Boards covering the 235 type 1...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morris, L., Edwards, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-03T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215578</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215578</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Footprint of social prescribing in emergency medicine in the UK]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214271v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing time from presentation to diagnosis of scaphoid fractures with cone beam CT: a before-and-after study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214271v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Scaphoid fractures comprise approximately 50&ndash;70% of carpal bone fractures but can be difficult to detect on initial plain film radiographs. A delayed diagnosis can lead to a high rate of non-union, avascular necrosis and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Current literature supports cone beam CT (CBCT) (within 10&ndash;14 days) as an effective method for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. We implemented an early outpatient CBCT pathway, prior to specialist review, with the aim to increase the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture undergoing CBCT within 7 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We designed an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the Emergency Department (ED) in which outpatient CBCT was requested by emergency medicine clinicians. A retrospective audit of current management of these patients was performed between 1 August 2022 and 31 October 2022 (prepathway period). A list of patients who underwent CBCT performed for the indication &lsquo;suspected scaphoid or carpal bone fracture&rsquo; in the hospital was obtained and screened. Implementation of the pathway took place in February 2023 and was reviewed by continuous audit monitoring from 1 March 2023 to 31 May 2023 (postpathway period).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Prepathway implementation, 54 patients underwent CBCT. Following implementation of our pathway, the number of CBCTs performed in the hospital for this clinical indication increased to 111 (postpathway). The proportion of patients undergoing CBCT within 7 days increased from 11.1% (6/54) to 91.8% (102/111) (p&lt;0.000). There was a 71.9% reduction in fracture clinic attendances (50/54 (92.6%) prepathway and 23/111 (22.5%) post pathway (p&lt;0.000).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>We successfully implemented an ambulatory pathway for suspected scaphoid fractures in the ED that significantly increased the proportion of patients with suspected scaphoid fractures undergoing early (&lt;7 days) CBCT and definitive care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flanagan, L., Loughran, S., Bassa, B. A., Colgan, G., Umana, E., Ramiah, V., Mara, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T09:00:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214271</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214271</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing time from presentation to diagnosis of scaphoid fractures with cone beam CT: a before-and-after study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215470v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Myoglobin-to-creatine kinase ratio enhances prediction of acute kidney injury in rhabdomyolysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215470v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a key complication of rhabdomyolysis. Creatine kinase (CK), the standard muscle injury biomarker, has limited predictive value. Myoglobin may be more accurate but has its limitations. The myoglobin-to-CK ratio may be a stronger predictor but lacks prospective validation. We aimed to validate this ratio using admission values, compare it with CK and myoglobin, and identify thresholds for early AKI risk stratification.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Prospective multicentre cohort study across four hospitals in Oslo and Akershus, Norway (2019&ndash;2022). All adults with CK &ge;5000U/L and/or myoglobin &ge;1000ng/mL at emergency department presentation or within 72 hours thereafter were eligible, irrespective of admission. Primary outcome was AKI. Predictive performance of CK, myoglobin and the myoglobin-to-CK ratio was assessed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the 310 included patients, 108 (35%) developed AKI. In ROC analysis the myoglobin-to-CK ratio was the strongest predictor of AKI on admission (area under the curve (AUC) 0.84, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.89), followed by myoglobin (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.79); CK was a weak predictor (AUC 0.31, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.37). In quartile analysis, 72% of patients in the highest ratio quartile developed AKI, with a ratio &ge;0.20 indicating risk. For myoglobin, 65% in the highest quartile developed AKI, with values &ge;6372ng/mL indicating risk. ROC analysis identified optimised cut-offs of 0.48 for the ratio (sensitivity/specificity 79/82%) and 4489ng/mL for myoglobin (61/76%). Combined, these cut-offs increased sensitivity and negative predictive value to 89% (95% CI 81.3% to 94.4%) and 92% (95% CI 86.2% to 96.0%), respectively, suggesting potential for identification of both high-risk and low-risk patients at admission.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The myoglobin-to-CK ratio was the strongest early predictor of AKI. Combined with myoglobin &ge;4489 ng/mL, a ratio &ge;0.48 identified 89% of AKI cases and ruled out 92% of non-AKI cases, suggesting a potential admission-based tool for early AKI risk stratification in rhabdomyolysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Trial registration number</st><p><A HREF="NCT04118608">NCT04118608</A>.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vangstad, M., Gulsvik, A. K., Kro Birkeland, J. A., Ervik, R. L., Brekke, F. B., Akkouh, O. A., Jacobsen, D., Bjornaas, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215470</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215470</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Myoglobin-to-creatine kinase ratio enhances prediction of acute kidney injury in rhabdomyolysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215433v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a village emergency care model: a pilot intervention in rural Tanzania]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215433v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Emergency services are essential to comprehensive primary healthcare (PHC) and resilient health systems. Prior to December 2021, such services were largely unavailable at the PHC level in Tanzania. To address this gap, we designed and piloted the village emergency care (VEC) model in a rural Tanzanian village. This study evaluates the VEC model&rsquo;s effectiveness 1 year after implementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A before-and-after sequential mixed-methods design was used. A community survey assessed changes in emergency care access among 191 participants at baseline and 270 postinterventions. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Pearson&rsquo;s &sup2; tests to assess preintervention and postintervention differences at a 5% significance level. Qualitative insights were obtained through three interviews with village leaders and healthcare providers, and one focus group with 10 community members, including members of the village health committee, at each phase. The primary outcome was perceived change in access, encompassing availability, acceptability, accommodation, affordability and physical accessibility. Secondary outcomes included awareness, satisfaction and perceived barriers. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Availability of emergency services increased from 61.0% to 84.4% (&sup2;=22.47, p&lt;0.001), satisfaction from 12.0% to 88.5% (&sup2;=187.6, p&lt;0.001) and awareness from 90.1% to 97.0% (&sup2;=9.03, p=0.003). Cultural barriers declined from 17.3% to 5.2% (&sup2;=18.56, p&lt;0.001). Perceived affordability rose from 9.0% to 51.1% (&sup2;=56.91, p&lt;0.001), however, cost remained a barrier, rising from 16.0% to 35.5% (&sup2;=4.81, p=0.028). Qualitative findings underscored greater awareness and trust in services but identified persistent financial barriers, particularly for high-cost treatments like antivenom. Health insurance coverage remained limited, with many relying on out-of-pocket payments.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The VEC model significantly improved awareness, satisfaction and access to emergency care in a rural PHC setting. Expanding insurance literacy and coverage, alongside cost transparency and future cost-effectiveness analyses, is recommended to support equitable national scale-up.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sirili, N., Hyuha, G., Kiwango, G., Nyamle, N., Kilonzi, M., Mussa, R., Frumence, G., Sawe, H. R., Mfinanga, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-28T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215433</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215433</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness of a village emergency care model: a pilot intervention in rural Tanzania]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215118v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Designing a theory-informed feedback system for prehospital cardiac arrest care: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215118v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Feedback is a vital yet underused tool for improving clinical outcomes in prehospital emergency care. This study aimed to develop and pilot a novel, theoretically grounded feedback mechanism for helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) clinicians involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the East of England, UK.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Semistructured interviews were conducted in September 2022 with HEMS clinicians from Essex &amp; Herts Air Ambulance, and the feedback process was co-designed with the Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (Essex, UK). Using the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour), we conducted qualitative interviews with prehospitalists (seven paramedics, three prehospital doctors) to explore gaps in existing feedback processes and identify their information needs, then iteratively co-developed a structured feedback proforma with stakeholders.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Three themes emerged, specifically about weaknesses in current feedback and preferences for an improved system: (1) dissatisfaction with current ad hoc, &lsquo;punitive&rsquo; approaches; (2) the educational and emotional importance of timely, targeted feedback; and (3) a strong preference for standardised, confidentiality-compliant delivery methods. The resulting feedback proforma included working diagnoses, key investigations completed, optimisation opportunities and patient outcomes (if already available), to be delivered within 24&ndash;48 hours of hospital admission.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our study underscores the importance of stakeholder-driven development in shaping an effective prehospital feedback mechanism for OHCA aligned to clinicians&rsquo; needs. By exploring feedback preferences and mapping insights onto the COM-B model, we highlight how knowledge, context and motivation can all steer behavioural change. Further research is needed in diverse emergency medical service contexts to test its impact on clinical practice and patient outcomes.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mion, M., Simpson, R. F. G., Pitcairn, A., Grier, G., Sajjad, U., Beadle, E., Keane, S., Movio, G., Butt, H., Ibrahim, A., Maccaroni, M., Davies, J., Keeble, T. R. R., Snowsill, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T09:00:22-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215118</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215118</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Designing a theory-informed feedback system for prehospital cardiac arrest care: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215389v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Haemodynamic monitoring during cardiac arrest: a systematic review of diastolic blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215389v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate whether intra-arrest diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) are associated with improved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in cardiac arrest.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A systematic search (PROSPERO registration: CRD420251042344) was conducted in English on EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1 May 2025. Grey literature sources (trial registries, conference abstracts, Google Scholar) were searched. Key resuscitation experts were contacted to identify unpublished or ongoing studies. The search strategy was peer-reviewed using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) contributing cohort data, observational studies and case series (&ge;10 patients) monitoring intra-arrest DBP or CPP in adult patients with cardiac arrest managed in prehospital or emergency department settings. Study selection involved two reviewers independently screening titles and abstracts, and full-text articles. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. This research received no funding.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>15 studies (n=970 patients) across seven countries were included: 3 RCT-based prospective cohort studies and 12 observational studies. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity in study designs. Aziz <I>et al</I> identified a DBP threshold of 35 mm Hg associated with ROSC (p&lt;0.001), reporting a 5% increase in ROSC odds for every 1 mm Hg rise in DBP. This finding was supported by other observational studies reporting significantly higher maximum DBP values in patients with ROSC (34&ndash;56.5 mm Hg) compared with those without ROSC. Interventional studies aimed at augmenting DBP or CPP&mdash;including resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta&mdash;generally reported increases in ROSC, though studies were underpowered and at high risk of bias.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This review demonstrates an association between intra-arrest DBP and CPP and ROSC. DBP may provide a feasible clinical target, but definitive thresholds and their impact on survival to hospital discharge remain undefined.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD420251042344.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, R., Carley, S., Mills-Moore, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T09:00:21-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215389</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215389</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Haemodynamic monitoring during cardiac arrest: a systematic review of diastolic blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215742v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with redirection to other services from the emergency department: a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215742v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with increased likelihood of emergency department (ED) attendance across the spectrum of illness severity.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Despite limited evidence of benefit to patients and health systems,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> redirection of low-acuity ED patients to primary care has been adopted by many healthcare systems internationally, with the aim of reducing ED overcrowding. As patients experiencing socioeconomic deprivation have poorer access to primary healthcare than their more affluent counterparts,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> there is a risk that redirection results in unmet needs for this vulnerable patient group and exacerbates the Inverse Care Law, that &lsquo;the availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served&rsquo;.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> This study aimed to assess how redirection policies impact different groups; to inform system design and ensure patients are redirected to services that are accessible.</p><p>A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study of every presentation to three EDs in...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McHenry, R., Campbell, M., Chung, D., Blane, D., Corfield, A. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T09:00:43-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215742</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215742</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with redirection to other services from the emergency department: a multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214733v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What factors delay initiation of bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Results from an analysis of 200 recorded ambulance calls]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214733v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is often not initiated promptly enough in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, even when call-handlers provide instructions. Identifying the critical, potentially modifiable, barriers to CPR is essential. Our aim was to identify factors associated with delays (1) positioning patient flat and (2) initiating CPR in recordings of cardiac arrest calls and to explore potentially modifiable behavioural factors.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Retrospective analysis of 200 call recordings to the Scottish Ambulance Service January 2019&ndash;December 2020 during which dispatcher-assisted CPR instructions were provided. Potential barriers were coded inductively. Log rank tests were used to explore differences in &lsquo;time to position patient flat&rsquo; and &lsquo;time to initiate CPR&rsquo; depending on the presence/absence of potential barriers identified.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A random sample of 200 calls were selected from 11 275 potentially eligible calls. Patients in those calls were mostly male (61%), most aged 40&ndash;80s; callers were mostly female spouses. Time to position patient flat: median 40 s (IQR: 15.5&ndash;82.0), time to initiate CPR: median 50 s (IQR: 36&ndash;92). Between 1 and 11 potential barriers were identified in calls (median=4, IQR:2&ndash;6).</p><p>The most common barriers identified were communication (48%), emotion (45.5%) and physical challenges (38.5%). Various physical challenges, concern patient too heavy, concern that it was too late/futile, concern about physical ability, concern about doing harm and caller being &lsquo;upset&rsquo; were significantly associated with delays to positioning the patient flat. Callers &lsquo;not knowing how&rsquo; to do CPR; expressing concerns about doing harm, expressing anger and various physical challenges including concerns about ability were associated with delays in initiating CPR. Many significant barriers are potentially amenable to behavioural techniques.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Barriers to &lsquo;positioning the patient flat&rsquo; and &lsquo;initiating CPR&rsquo; are not the same. Concerns vary, and so identifying and addressing the specific concerns for individual callers at each stage might facilitate earlier CPR. Many of the issues delaying CPR are potentially modifiable with behavioural techniques.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farquharson, B., Johnston, M., Best, C., Clegg, G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T00:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214733</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214733</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What factors delay initiation of bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Results from an analysis of 200 recorded ambulance calls]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215575v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Research priorities for paediatric procedural sedation in emergency medicine]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215575v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Procedural sedation is routinely provided for children in the emergency care setting. However, there are still significant gaps in knowledge regarding the optimal provision of sedation for children who are undergoing painful and/or distressing procedures. We aimed to develop a prioritised research agenda that identifies key questions for paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency care setting that will guide future research and optimise care for children.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used a modified Delphi approach to achieve consensus among a multidisciplinary and geographically diverse expert advisory group. An initial list of 42 research questions was identified, with successive rounds of questionnaires conducted until there was a convergence of opinion or a point of diminishing returns was reached. The list was iteratively refined each round by advisory group members who ranked research questions and were given the opportunity to provide suggestions for potential additional questions and provide feedback regarding questions considered.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>54 advisory group members participated in the modified Delphi approach. Over the course of two rounds, we identified 10 research questions as the highest priority for future investigation. These questions included topics addressing short- and long-term outcomes related to inadequate assessment and provision of sedation, patient-centered and family-centered outcomes, validity and reliability of clinically important outcome measures, most effective sedative regimens for children undergoing painful procedures, most effective sedative regimens for children undergoing non-painful procedures, most effective sedatives for minimal sedation/anxiolysis, effectiveness of novel sedation approaches, eliminating health disparities, clinician education and competency and the use of simulation to improve sedation outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The 10 research questions identified as highest priority can inform future work by researchers, funders, policymakers and other key decision makers who aim to meaningfully advance the provision of procedural sedation for children cared for in the emergency care setting.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tsze, D. S., Burger, R. K., Klein, E. J., Chang, T. P., Coleman, K. D., Rogers, A. J., Sulton, C. D., Chumpitazi, C. E., Tunc, E. M., Drendel, A. L., on behalf of PECARN Analgesia and Sedation Working Group, PECARN Analgesia and Sedation Working Group, Browne, Burger, Chumpitazi, Coleman, Drendel, Guiner-da Silva, Klein, Rogers, Sulton, Tsze, Tunc, Uspal]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215575</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215575</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Research priorities for paediatric procedural sedation in emergency medicine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215335v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preoxygenation in prehospital critical care: a survey of HEMS practices in eight European countries]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215335v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Tracheal intubation in critically ill patients carries a high risk of peri-intubation hypoxaemia.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Effective preoxygenation is essential to extend safe apnoea time and reduce the risk of desaturation during airway management. Recent studies in emergency departments and intensive care units have shown that non-invasive ventilation (NIV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) significantly reduces hypoxaemia compared with conventional approaches like non-rebreathable face masks (NRM).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> Although NIV is increasingly used in hospitals, it may be unavailable or impractical in prehospital settings, where airway interventions are still common. A retrospective analysis of over 227 000 Emergency Medical System (EMS) missions in Germany found that 8% of patients required advanced airway management.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p><p>Prehospital intubation is often more complex than in-hospital procedures and associated with a higher risk of hypoxaemia.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4 5</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref> Despite this, little is known about preoxygenation strategies used in prehospital critical care....]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rauch, S., Pietsch, U., Roveri, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-16T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215335</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215335</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preoxygenation in prehospital critical care: a survey of HEMS practices in eight European countries]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215806v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['The Lightbulb Sign: why socioeconomic clues at scene matter for emergency care]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215806v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a small but striking detail that frontline emergency teams notice with uncomfortable regularity: the &lsquo;lightbulb sign&rsquo;. You enter a home and the bulbs are out, not because of a power cut, but because the household cannot afford replacements, or because money is being diverted to heating, food or even to fund substance abuse. The room is dim, but the message is bright and unequivocal: a patient&rsquo;s environment provides vital information that shapes how we assess risk, plan care and anticipate complications.</p><p>Socioeconomic deprivation is strongly linked to worse health outcomes across obesity,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> smoking,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> mental health<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> and multimorbidity. These are not lifestyle choices in any meaningful sense; they are predictable outcomes of structural inequality. Emergency clinicians see the sharp end of this gradient. People living in poorer areas present later, sicker and with more complex social needs. They experience higher rates of chronic disease,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumb, J., Saddler, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-12T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215806</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215806</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA['The Lightbulb Sign: why socioeconomic clues at scene matter for emergency care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>The view from here</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214901v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evaluating the consistency of coding in the Emergency Care Data Set compared with data recorded in the electronic patient record]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214901v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>The Emergency Care Data Set (ECDS), introduced in 2017,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> aims to standardise and improve data collection across type 1, 2 and 3 emergency departments (EDs) in England. Comprehensive data collection is essential for identifying service usage patterns, planning resource allocation, improving communication<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> and improving patient outcomes. However, the value of insights derived from the ECDS is contingent on the quality of its coded data. This study evaluates the consistent recording of a subset of ECDS codes compared with data extracted from electronic patient records (EPR), with the aim of identifying gaps and recommending improvements to ensure more reliable data collection.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Methods</st><p>180 patient attendances were randomly selected from attendances to Leeds General Infirmary and St Jame&rsquo;s University Hospital EDs during April 2024. Data collection included both structured ECDS data and unstructured EPR entries. Both reviewers extracted the data using a standardised form to ensure consistency (AFJW...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Websdale, A. F. J., Webster, A. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-09T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-214901</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-214901</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evaluating the consistency of coding in the Emergency Care Data Set compared with data recorded in the electronic patient record]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215647v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early calcium disturbances in trauma: prehospital measurement by a UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Service]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215647v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Objectives</st><p>Calcium administration in traumatic haemorrhage is a leading prehospital research priority.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Previous studies have demonstrated that both trauma-related ionised hypocalcaemia (iHypoCa) and ionised hypercalcaemia (iHyperCa) are present on arrival in the emergency department, and both are associated with increased mortality and adverse outcomes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2&ndash;4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref> No studies have examined how early calcium disturbances occur and whether calcium disturbances are observed prehospital.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> This makes protocolised calcium replacement without ionised calcium (iCa) measurement challenging as it may undertreat some patients and overtreat others.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4 5</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref> All UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) carry blood products and calcium replacement therapy; a small proportion of HEMS use iCa point-of-care testing (POCT).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> This study is hypothesis-generating and aims to identify whether trauma-related calcium disturbances occur before hospital arrival and whether POCT may have a role in detecting these.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Methods</st><p>This case series...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hibberd, O., Price, J., Lachowycz, K., Leech, C., Barnard, E. B. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-07T09:00:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215647</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215647</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early calcium disturbances in trauma: prehospital measurement by a UK Helicopter Emergency Medical Service]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214837v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Association between catchment-area demographics and emergency department presentation rates and delays: a national cross-sectional study]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214837v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Emergency department (ED) utilisation and delays are a major public health concern internationally, with increased mortality with ED delays and overcrowding. The study aimed to assess how the population characteristics of ED catchment areas are associated with ED use and delays to admission or discharge, and how catchment presentation rates are associated with ED delays.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A cross-sectional study of presentations and delays to all 27 Scottish EDs for December 2023&ndash;February 2024. Catchment areas were defined for every ED in Scotland and population demographics for each, as Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) and 8-fold Urban&ndash;Rural Classification (UR8). ED performance metrics for the study period were extracted from routinely reported data. Robust regression assessed the associations between catchment area demographics and ED delays, with negative binomial regression analysis of the association between catchment area demographics and presentation rates for the local population, reported as incidence rate ratio (IRR).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>For each decile lower (more deprived) in median SIMD, monthly attendances increased by 10% (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.11). For each step more rural in the median UR8 of a catchment, the percentage of patients experiencing a delay to admission or discharge of over 4 hours reduced by 5.3% (95% CI 4.9% to 5.7%), and each step more deprived in median SIMD decile of a catchment area was associated with 4.8% more delays beyond 4 hours (95% CI 3.0 to 6.8%). There was no association between presentation rates and delay to admission or discharge.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>EDs with more deprived catchment areas have higher presentation rates and greater delays in care. More rural EDs have fewer delays, which may mitigate some of the effects of geographical isolation in the provision of more timely care. In isolation, ED presentation rates are not associated with delays to care, adding to evidence that overall attendances are less important than other factors contributing to ED delays. Policymakers should consider the allocation of resources to best promote health equity.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McHenry, R., Moultrie, C. E. J., Corfield, A. R., MacKay, D. F., Pell, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-30T09:00:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214837</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214837</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Association between catchment-area demographics and emergency department presentation rates and delays: a national cross-sectional study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215355v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Interventions to reduce imaging in children with upper or lower extremity injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215355v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Radiation exposure, transition delays and costs associated with unnecessary imaging in children have stimulated research into clinical decision rules and other interventions to reduce imaging in the emergency department (ED). The objective of this systematic review is to examine the effectiveness of implementing interventions to reduce imaging in children with upper/lower extremity injuries in the ED.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Seven databases and the grey literature were searched up to May 2024. Comparative studies assessing interventions to reduce imaging in children with upper/lower extremity injuries implemented in the ED were eligible. Two independent reviewers screened for study eligibility, quality assessment and data extraction, with disagreements settled via third-party adjudication. Changes in imaging are reported as ORs with 95% CIs, using a random effects model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>From 9387 citations, eight unique studies enrolling 7793 children were included with the majority using a before&ndash;after design. Potential concerns for bias were documented due to a lack of reporting of key quality domains. Decision rules for ankle injuries successfully reduced radiography (OR=0.11; 95% CI 0.07 to 0.16, I<sup>2</sup>=38%). A decision rule for wrist injuries reduced imaging (OR=0.06; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.11); however, eight injuries were missed. Two studies implementing clinical guidelines reported decreases in radiographs per patient (p&lt;0.001). One trial reported increased imaging in children assessed by triage nurses using an established clinical decision rule (OR=5.44; 95% CI 2.96 to 10.02), with 16 missed injuries identified.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Guidelines incorporating clinical decision rules, particularly decision rules for ankle injuries, can reduce radiography for children with extremity injuries in the ED. Further investigations are warranted to identify other extremity injuries, the components of the intervention and the most efficient clinicians to target.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD42016042875.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirkland, S. W., Lesyk, N., Herle, E., Yang, E., Ushko, J., Villa-Roel, C., Campbell, S., Krebs, L. D., Sevcik, W., Rowe, B. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-24T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215355</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215355</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Interventions to reduce imaging in children with upper or lower extremity injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Systematic review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214861v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Utilisation of an emergency medical services pathway into a virtual emergency department and the impact on non-transports and patient safety]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-214861v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>The establishment of an emergency medical services (EMS) pathway into a virtual emergency service&mdash;the Victorian Virtual Emergency Department (VVED)&mdash;introduced a video-enabled telehealth consultation service for patients assessed and treated by paramedics. This study examined the utilisation of the VVED by EMS in Victoria, Australia, including its impact on rates of non-transport to hospital and EMS reattendance.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective study of all presentations (aged &ge;12 years) to EMS between October 2021 and May 2023. EMS data were linked to VVED records. Surveys were distributed following VVED consultation to explore patient experience. Interrupted time-series analyses were used to evaluate the impact of VVED on non-transport rates and EMS reattendance within 24 hours. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of non-transport and EMS reattendance.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>There were 914 747 EMS presentations within the study period, of which 30 433 (3.3%) were referred to VVED. Compared with those not referred, those referred to VVED were older with fewer vital sign derangements. Of VVED referrals, the median case time was 23 min shorter compared with cases not referred to VVED, and 74% were not transported. Compared with baseline, the VVED phase-in period was associated with a non-significant change in level (incident rate ratios (IRR): 1.03, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.06) and significant change in trend per 30 days (IRR: 1.01, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.02) for non-transports. Full implementation of VVED was associated with a step-reduction (IRR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99) and downward trend per 30 days (IRR: 0.99, 95% CI 0.98 to 0.99). In both the VVED phase-in and full implementation periods, no associations were found for reattendance to EMS. After adjustment for clinical presentation and acuity, VVED referral was associated with a 16-fold (adjusted OR: 15.97 95% CI 15.53 to 16.43) increase in the odds of non-transport. Among the 8.9% of patients who responded to the survey, satisfaction of the VVED was high (91.1%).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The EMS-VVED referral pathway contributed to significant improvements in ambulance non-transports and case-time savings.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahony, E., Magnuson, N., Thornton, A., Nehme, E., Scott, S., Talevski, J., Miller, S. M., Sher, L., Nehme, Z.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-23T09:00:28-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-214861</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-214861</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Utilisation of an emergency medical services pathway into a virtual emergency department and the impact on non-transports and patient safety]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-23</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215309v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Sex differences in rural prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215309v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>In rural settings, women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are less likely to receive timely reperfusion than men. We explore factors that may impact time to reperfusion by sex for patients with STEMI.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We conducted a cohort study of adults with STEMI activations from 2016 to 2020 using regional North Carolina STEMI registry data, which included eight rural emergency medical services (EMS) agencies and three percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centres. The primary outcome was EMS first medical contact to PCI in &le;90 min. By sex, we evaluated prehospital time intervals (dispatch, response, time-to-ECG, catheterisation laboratory activation, on-scene, transport and total EMS) and door-to-balloon time with clustered Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We also evaluated agency and patient factors associated with timely reperfusion using generalised estimating equations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of the 365 patients included, 30.1% (110/365) were female with a mean age of 62.5&plusmn;12.7. Fewer women received PCI within 90 min compared with men (43.6% vs 67.8%, p&lt;0.001). Women also experienced significantly longer total EMS time (42.5 vs 40.0 min, p=0.049) and door-to-balloon time (48.5 vs 40.0 min, p=0.01). Other time intervals were similar. After adjustment, women without exertional symptoms, with diabetes or with hypercholesterolaemia had lower odds of timely reperfusion. Among men, lower odds of timely reperfusion were observed among those without pain, who had catheterisation lab activation between 17:00 and 07:00, who were older or who had farther transport.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>In rural settings, women without exertional chest pain and those with comorbid conditions were less likely to have timely reperfusion. Women experienced significantly longer total EMS time and door-to-balloon time than men.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supples, M. W., Carpenter, R. S., Ashburn, N. P., Brown, W. M., Snavely, A. C., Miller, C. D., Stopyra, J. P., Mahler, S. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-20T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215309</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215309</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Sex differences in rural prehospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215303v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Online learning and emergency global health partnerships: a qualitative study of virtual grand rounds]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215303v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Global health partnerships involve collaboration between institutions and individuals working in different contexts, typically between high-resource and low-resource settings. They are based on principles of mutual learning, play an important role in emergency care systems strengthening and are increasingly being delivered online. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of online learning in an emergency care partnership between Uganda and the UK through assessment of virtual grand rounds (VGRs).</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A qualitative study was undertaken using a constructivist approach based on applicability to learning in medical education and complex social environments. Kirkpatrick&rsquo;s model of evaluation was used as a theoretical framework for determining effectiveness. Purposive sampling was used to guide recruitment, and semistructured interviews were undertaken with emergency practitioners involved in the VGRs programme. Interviews were transcribed and interpreted through iterative thematic analysis. Codes were developed deductively through critical literature review and inductively based on participant experiences.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>12 interviews were conducted with facilitators, presenters and learners from both Uganda and the UK. Participants included senior doctors, residents, nurses and Ministry of Health representatives. Four core themes emerged: (1) VGRs can be used to support global emergency medicine education. Learning occurs through sharing experience, interaction and discussion. (2) Success depends on stakeholder engagement. (3) Technical factors can act as barriers and facilitators and are integral to effectiveness and (4) VGRs have impact beyond education including areas of multidisciplinary work and health system strengthening.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study found that the VGR format is an effective method for online learning and has relevance to emergency care in all contexts. Factors were identified that have applicability to partnership programmes beyond emergency care including health system strengthening, specialty development and sustainability.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowsby, R., Muwonge, H., Komagum, F., Maurine, L., Gidwani, S., Fryer, A., Parham, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-04T21:34:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215303</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215303</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Online learning and emergency global health partnerships: a qualitative study of virtual grand rounds]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214621v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidence, outcome and dynamics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the city of Vienna between 2019 and 2023]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214621v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Regional data and trends in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are vital to improve favourable outcomes. Since the last cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guideline update, comprehensive OHCA data of the metropolitan area of Vienna, Austria, have been scarce.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>This retrospective study analysed adult non-traumatic OHCA cases in Vienna between January 2019 and December 2023. It assessed emergency medical service records and clinical patient data and reported incidences, return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rates, survival to hospital discharge and neurological outcome. Logistic regression assessed associations between outcomes and predictors, while Poisson regression examined incidence changes before, during and after COVID-19 lockdowns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>During the observation period, the Emergency Medical Service Vienna started CPR in a total of 7433 patients (77.1/100 000 population per year). Sustained ROSC was observed in 24.8%, survival to hospital discharge in 9.3% and a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) Score of 1 or 2 in 6.8%, similar to prior data. However, patients with witnessed cardiac arrest of suspected cardiac aetiology and an initial shockable rhythm had a substantially higher rate of survival to hospital discharge (39%), and CPC of 1 or 2 (29.6%). Similarly, patients with CPC 1 or 2 before CPR had better outcomes than the overall cohort. During COVID-19, there was a decline in all outcome parameters.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Survival after OHCA in Vienna seems stable, but significant improvements in outcome parameters are seen in a &lsquo;high outcome potential cohort&rsquo; over the last 15 years. This reaffirms the need to continue focusing on rapid initiation of bystander CPR and early defibrillation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Krammel, M., Kornfehl, A., Grassmann, D., Hamp, T., Grubmiller, T., Nuernberger, A., Domanovits, H., Aigner, P., Girsa, M., Glaninger, P., Zajicek, A., Sulzgruber, P., Holzer, M., Schnaubelt, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-04T21:34:05-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214621</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214621</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidence, outcome and dynamics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the city of Vienna between 2019 and 2023]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215295v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Common femoral artery access in emergency medicine]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2025-215295v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Advanced vascular access skills are an essential component of all critical care specialty curricula. However, common femoral artery (CFA) cannulation and sheath insertion has thus far not been emphasised within emergency medicine training. The advent of life-saving endovascular resuscitation techniques in both medical and traumatic disease, along with the inherent advantages of central arterial pressure monitoring in the severely haemodynamically compromised patient, mandates the prioritisation and deliberate practice of this procedure.</p><p>CFA access facilitates central invasive arterial pressure monitoring as well as Seldinger-guided sheath insertion through which a number of resuscitation devices may be inserted further into the arterial system and left heart&mdash;termed &lsquo;endovascular resuscitation&rsquo;. Arterial line placement is considered core to emergency medicine training by Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM), but this is not specific to the skill of CFA access. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) CPR is likely to become increasingly common in refractory cardiac arrest. ECMO is listed as a scope of practice skill for emergency medicine by ACEM. ECPR is now an American Heart Association (AHA) Class 2 recommendation for cardiac arrest. The ELSO registry reports indicate a steady increase in ECPR globally in the last 5 years. ECMO technology development and increasingly procedural and indication refinements will also likely mean this intervention will become simpler to perform and manage. There is an increasing focus on perfecting this skill prior to embarking on training programmes for endovascular resuscitation or ECPR in both the prehospital and in-hospital emergency medicine environment. We describe the key technical steps in performance of this procedure, discuss acquisition and maintenance of competency, and describe pitfalls. CFA access in emergency medicine has an increasing relevance to practice. It is imperative that this procedural skill is given diligence in training, process, governance and relevance to emergency medicine practice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burns, B., Kruit, N., Dennis, M., Shinar, Z., Rees, P., Wong, S., Plunkett, B., Reid, C., Carley, S., Yannopoulos, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-10-28T22:55:52-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215295</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215295</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Common femoral artery access in emergency medicine]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-10-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Practice review</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214536v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Person-centred emergency care: translation and cross-cultural validation of the Australian Emergency Department Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) in the Netherlands]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/emermed-2024-214536v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Measuring and evaluating patient experience in the emergency department (ED) is essential for improving the quality of emergency care. However, specific and validated tools to measure patient experience in the ED are lacking in many countries. The aim of this study was therefore to translate and cross-culturally validate the Australian ED Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) for the Dutch setting.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A single-centre validation study was conducted in a Dutch academic hospital. Step 1 involved forward and backward translation to produce a Dutch translation of the ED PREM (prototype). Step 2 involved establishing face and content validity of the Dutch prototype through cognitive patient interviews and researcher team consensus meetings. Step 3 involved administering the resultant Dutch pilot ED PREM to an ED population (n=527), to be able to perform psychometric analyses on this sample. Descriptive statistics and item reduction analyses were conducted prior to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). CFA was used to confirm the structural validity of the Dutch ED PREM, and internal consistency was assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>The face and content validity of the prototype Dutch ED PREM was &lsquo;good&rsquo; after 15 cognitive interviews and expert consultation. Over two-thirds of participants (357/527) completed the Dutch pilot ED PREM. Scores were high across all four domains. Several items were removed due to high ceiling effects and a large number of &lsquo;not applicable&rsquo; responses. The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed acceptable model fit with CFA (<sup>2</sup>(df) 7519.55 (153), p&lt;0.001, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.090, Tucker-Lewis Index=0.942, Comparative Fit Index=0.951, Standardised Root Mean Square Residual=0.035). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach&rsquo;s alpha ranged 0.85&ndash;0.97 per domain).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The final 18-item Dutch ED PREM showed good validity and reliability for measuring ED patient experience. It is suitable and feasible for use in clinical practice to assess and improve the person-centredness of emergency care.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tuinte, R. A. M., Bull, C., Hoonhorst, J. M., Akkermans, R. P., Moors, M. L., ten Oever, J., Hulscher, M. E., Hoogerwerf, J. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-07-29T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2024-214536</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2024-214536</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Person-centred emergency care: translation and cross-cultural validation of the Australian Emergency Department Patient-Reported Experience Measure (ED PREM) in the Netherlands]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-07-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>