<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal Primary survey</title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
<description>Emergency Medicine Journal RSS feed -- recent Primary survey articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1472-0213</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Emergency Medicine Journal</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1472-0205</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/39/8/567?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/39/8/567?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights from this issue]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/39/8/567?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec id="s1"><st>The COVID-19 oximetry at home programme</st> <p>This months Editors Choice is an analysis of the CO@h programme. In November 2020, NHS England recommended that patients with symptomatic confirmed COVID-19 who were over 65 years or clinically vulnerable be provided with a pulse oximeter and to call emergency services if the reading was &le;92% or primary care if the reading was 93%&ndash;94%. During the study period of October 2020 to May 2021, 217K patients were within the inclusion criteria but only 2.5% of these were enrolled into the programme and there was considerable variation between the definition/inclusion of clinically vulnerable, start dates and take up in each region. Analysing data pre and post implementation, there was no significant difference in 28 day mortality. There was a small increase in both ED attendances and a similar increase in emergency hospital admissions, which may reflect that pulse oximetry was effective at detecting...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leech, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2022-07-20T02:34:09-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2022-212705</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2022-212705</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[EMJ Primary survey]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights from this issue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2022-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Primary survey</prism:section>
<prism:volume>39</prism:volume>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>567</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>567</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>