<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal PostScript</title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
<description>Emergency Medicine Journal RSS feed -- recent PostScript articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1472-0213</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Emergency Medicine Journal</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1472-0205</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/30?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/69?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif">
<title>Emergency Medicine Journal</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.emj.bmj.com/homepage/EMJ_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/30?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Potential impact of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition: findings from a cardiac emergency department]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/30?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The emergency department (ED) use of safe and time-efficient 0-1-hour assessment algorithms for suspected myocardial infarction (MI) is recommended.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> However, laboratory-based high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) results are often not available within 1 hour from blood draw.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Point-of-care (POC) hs-cTn assays, with shorter turnaround times (TATs), would solve this problem.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> One study has reported reduced ED length of stay (LOS) from POC-hs-cTnI use in routine clinical care.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> At the Victorian Heart Hospital ED (Monash Health, Australia), we evaluated one of the available POC-hs-cTnI assays, the TriageTrue analyser (QuidelOrtho Corporation, San Diego, California, USA), for which evidence of benefits in actual practice remains limited.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4 5</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref> We compared the potential LOS which could result from POC use with the actual LOS using our laboratory Access hsTnI assay.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> Characteristics of both assays are defined and publicly available.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> The...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Meek, R., Lu, Z. X., Senarathne, U. D., Tan, S., Cullen, L., Pickering, J. W., Than, M. P., Hayden, G., Damianopoulos, A., Charteris, C., Duong, A., Egerton-Warburton, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-214985</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-214985</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Potential impact of a point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay on emergency department length of stay and patient disposition: findings from a cardiac emergency department]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>30</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>32</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[More ACP, less CPR?]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>I read the paper recently published by Battin <I>et al</I> with interest.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> It provides useful data on out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in English care homes. Their reported 30-day survival of 2.1% is notable but not surprising given the prevalence of comorbidities and frailty in this population.</p> <p>As often is the case with new data, this paper raises many unanswered questions. For example, what was the rate of survival with a &lsquo;good&rsquo; outcome? How many care home residents suffered a cardiac arrest and were not resuscitated? In how many patients was resuscitation in keeping with their goals and values? Some of these questions are difficult to answer, but they are crucially important.</p> <p>While these data are a valuable contribution to the literature, I disagree with the authors&rsquo; interpretation that closer monitoring of residents and staff Basic Life Support (BLS) competency is the answer. Yes&mdash;healthcare professionals should have appropriate training...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Love, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215245</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215245</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[More ACP, less CPR?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>67</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Contact with emergency departments and hospitals in England before suicide death: a retrospective cohort study by Healey et al]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/67-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We read with interest the article by Healey <I>et al</I>,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> which highlights the significant, yet under-recognised, issue of emergency department (ED) contact prior to suicide. While struck by the presented data, we raise the following points.</p> <p>First, the study found nearly 21% of individuals had ED contact within 1 month before suicide. This suggests many at-risk patients signal distress through ED visits. However, the analysis omitted the primary reasons for these visits (eg, self-harm, accidental injury, mental disorder) and whether suicide risk assessments were performed. Individuals contemplating suicide often avoid mental health services due to difficulty distinguishing physical from psychological distress, or concerns about stigma and burdening others. Consequently, they may turn to EDs. Yet, strained ED resources and standard triage systems struggle to identify psychological crisis, potentially delaying care. Long waits might deter disclosure. Financial barriers in some systems may also deter help seeking. Subgroup analysis of...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhou, Z., Xiao, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215336</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215336</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on 'Contact with emergency departments and hospitals in England before suicide death: a retrospective cohort study by Healey et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>67</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on 'Contact with emergency departments and hospitals in England before suicide death: a retrospective cohort study by Frances Healey et al]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We thank Drs Zijie and Lifeng<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> for their interest in our research findings and for demonstrating that people attending emergency departments before suicide death is an issue with international resonance.</p> <p>Their call for more research into the reasons for these emergency department attendances, the demographics of those who attended, and any psychiatric assessments and referrals that were made, echoes the research needs we highlighted. As our research letter noted, most of this additional detail will rely on researchers using local care records, rather than the national databases we used. We suspect accurately categorising reasons for attendance will be a complex research challenge, due to physical symptoms arising from mental health distress and the high proportion of people with coexisting serious mental illness and physical health conditions.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> While self-harm would be an obvious focus within future research, other reasons for emergency department attendance, such as injury...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Healey, F., Winter-Bates, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215501</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215501</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on 'Contact with emergency departments and hospitals in England before suicide death: a retrospective cohort study by Frances Healey et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>68</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: A prospective cohort study" by Mori et al]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/68-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We commend Mori <I>et al</I>&rsquo;s prospective cohort study in <I>Emergency Medicine Journal</I> on the diagnostic accuracy of the Tongue Coating Index (TCI) for acute appendicitis. This work addresses a key gap in non-invasive abdominal emergency diagnostics&mdash;especially valuable in resource-limited settings&mdash;and its rigorous comparison with the Alvarado Score offers important clinical insights. We appreciate their validation of a simple, low-burden assessment tool. While the study is methodologically sound, we have several observations to contribute to its clinical translation and future refinement.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p> <p><l type="romanupper"><li><p>Efficiency and feasibility of assessment in emergency scenarios</p> <p>Acute appendicitis is an acute abdominal condition; emergency care hinges on &lsquo;rapid triage&rsquo;&mdash;avoiding delayed surgery from missed diagnoses and unnecessary tests. This study&rsquo;s TCI assessment requires professional tongue imaging and offline scoring by two evaluators, which takes time. Yet in emergencies, doctors must complete preliminary assessments (history, exam, basic labs) in a relatively short time after a patient&rsquo;s...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luo, N., Zhou, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215547</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215547</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correspondence on "Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: A prospective cohort study" by Mori et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>68</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>69</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/69?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study by Mori et al]]></title>
<link>http://emj.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/43/1/69?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the correspondence<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> regarding our article.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p> <p><l type="romanupper"><li><p>We agree that the tongue itself may represent an important physical sign. The Tongue Coating Index (TCI) in our study should be regarded primarily as a research tool, and we believe that future work should aim to develop a more rapid and clinically feasible assessment method. Our intention was not to advocate for a specific score, but rather to highlight the potential clinical importance of tongue findings as a physical sign.</p> </li><li> <p>Because this is a diagnostic accuracy study rather than a causal inference study, adjustment for potential confounders was not essential for our primary aim. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that the TCI retains diagnostic utility across a variety of patient backgrounds, which supports its robustness. Furthermore, as highlighted in the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD 2015) guidelines, diagnostic accuracy...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mori, H., Yamasaki, K., Saishoji, Y., Torisu, Y., Mori, T., Nagai, Y., Izumi, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T05:13:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/emermed-2025-215572</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:emermed;emermed-2025-215572</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Response to: Correspondence on Diagnostic accuracy of tongue coating in identifying acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study by Mori et al]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>43</prism:volume>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>69</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>70</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>